<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    <title>Guest Columns</title>
    <category>Guest Columns</category>
    <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/section/columnists-guest-columns/feed/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://tj.durangoherald.com/section/columnists-guest-columns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Latest local news from The Durango Herald.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 21:00:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-decline-to-sign-animal-cruelty-ballot-initiative/</link>
        <title>Our View: Decline to sign animal cruelty ballot initiative</title>
        <description>Don’t sign animal cruelty ballot initiative</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:56:25 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C0F7358B-12C5-2EDF-E053-0100007F2C09</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Don’t sign animal cruelty ballot initiativeWithin the space of just five weeks, we find ourselves again defending Colorado ranchers and farmers against an irrational political salvo (March 19, “Governor blunders with ‘MeatOut Day’ proclamation”).This time, the issue is a ballot initiative with an appealing title: “Protect Animals from Unnecessary Suffering and Exploitation (PAUSE).” Heck, who doesn’t want to do that?But the title is misleading at best. The proposed statute would decimate the agricultural industry and Colorado’s economy while making it very expensive to eat meat – most of which would be old and tough.The initiative purports to improve upon Colorado’s existing animal cruelty statute. Proponents received approval by the state Title Board that this nonsensical screed is good to go; they will now seek the 124,632 signatures necessary to place it on the 2022 ballot.Lots of people who care about animals will be misled into believing this is a good thing. But we have seen no evidence it is needed.The proposed statute would require animals raised as livestock to live to one-quarter of their “natural lifespan” before slaughter. Sounds good, right? Not if you’re familiar with livestock practices.Lorene Bonds, a fourth-generation Colorado rancher and livestock supervisor of the La Plata County Fair, explained why: Beef cattle, for example, are generally slaughtered at 18-24 months. The proposal suggests cattle live to 20 years and thus would be required to live for five years before slaughter.First of all, Bonds said, the proposal’s authors are misinformed. Cattle don’t usually live beyond 16 years; most die by 14, no matter how humanely treated.And USDA food-safety regulations effect the age at which beef can be processed. If the initiative passes, say goodbye to your T-bones; parts of the cow cannot be used for human food after a certain age because of the risk of mad cow disease.If beef cattle were kept until age five before slaughter, the cost to feed them alone would increase by $1,200 per cow, Travis Taylor, a Colorado State University extension agent, told The Fencepost, a national agricultural newspaper. Taylor also said that increasing the production time would reduce the beef supply by 60%. Ultimately beef prices could double for the consumer.Colorado would lose in more ways than we can count. Some ranchers would go out of business. Jobs would be lost in a trickle-down. Feed growers would lose money, too (most corn grown in Colorado feeds livestock).Bonds had an even longer list: If ranches can’t remain profitable, ranchers will subdivide their property, and open space that serves wildlife as well as livestock will be lost. Irrigation water that is returned to the ground would be reduced. Forest allotments that cows help keep clear of wildfire fuel will overgrow. And more.Perhaps most egregious is the statute’s segment prohibiting any kind of penetration of an animal’s orifices, referred to as “sexual act with an animal” in the initiative. Anyone who’s ever watched “All Creatures Great and Small” or any TV or film about farming and ranching knows that veterinary medicine and animal husbandry practices include such penetrations as necessities; they are not “sexual acts.”We want animals to be treated humanely, including animals slaughtered for human consumption, whether on small family ranches or factory farms. We would support evidenced-based, sensible legislation with those values in mind.But this initiative’s potential impacts are devastating and would drive the wedge between urban and rural Coloradans even deeper.So if someone asks you to sign to put Initiative 16 on the 2022 ballot, invite them to join you for a Colorado-grown, organic beef burger (or sure, even a veggie burger) and a locally brewed beer at your neighborhood café instead. Decline to sign.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/rigney-sen-gardner-act-now-to-preserve-the-lwcf/</link>
        <title>Rigney: Sen. Gardner, act now to preserve the LWCF</title>
        <description>Rigney, Osprey Packsdu1-i-syn At Osprey – a leading manufacturer of outdoor gear employing over 115 people in the U.S. – we believe that adventure is open to everyone. Nowhere does that feel more true than in Colorado, which our company...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:04:17 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">7359CD4B-D5F1-1949-E053-0100007FDCF1</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=EB369484-DB04-4CDB-8F52-F1E7EDFFE191&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=EB369484-DB04-4CDB-8F52-F1E7EDFFE191&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Rigney, Osprey Packsdu1-i-syn At Osprey – a leading manufacturer of outdoor gear employing over 115 people in the U.S. – we believe that adventure is open to everyone. Nowhere does that feel more true than in Colorado, which our company has called home for almost 30 years. We just returned to Cortez after attending the Outdoor Retailer Summer Market in Denver, where Colorado’s strength as a powerhouse among the $887 billion outdoor industry was on full display. As evidenced by the hundreds of retailers, outfitters and manufacturers we saw at OR that choose to base their businesses in Colorado, our state’s thriving outdoor recreation industry continues to attract and sustain employers and their families. Outdoor recreation thrives in Colorado because of our incredible public lands. The spectacular places near our headquarters in Cortez – places like Mesa Verde National Park, Canyons of the Ancients National Monument and the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail – all inspire our employees and their families every day and were an important part of the reason we chose to locate there. Something that all of those places have in common? They were protected by the Land and Water Conservation Fund. One of our country’s most important conservation programs, LWCF has invested $268 million in the last 50 years to protect, improve and expand Colorado’s open spaces, public lands, parks and outdoor recreational areas. It even supports voluntary conservation of private lands and enjoys immense bipartisan support. Yet despite its unarguably good impacts, this landmark program is set to expire in less than two short months on Sept. 30. In July, Sens. Cory Gardner and Michael Bennet took the lead to permanently reauthorize LWCF. We applaud Sen. Gardner and Sen. Bennet for standing with outdoor recreationists, with those who care about nature, those who want to see wildlife, open spaces and history preserved, and with business owners like us who rely on these consumers and visitors. But, in much the same way that Coloradans are leading the outdoor industry, we urge Gardner to show leadership within the Republican party to protect public lands. Republicans should demonstrate their pro-business and pro-sportsmen policies by supporting LWCF. As business leaders and Coloradans, we ask Gardner to actively encourage his colleagues to support his amendment and to continue pushing for the permanent reauthorization and full funding of this critical tool for conservation. There are only a few weeks left to save LWCF. Sen. Gardner, the time to act is now. Layne Rigney is the president of Osprey Packs in Cortez.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/james-self-raised-and-it-shows/</link>
        <title>James: Self-raised and it shows</title>
        <description>Tom Jamesdu1-i-syn Anyone who knows me very well will tell you that I’m not the most fastidious man that ever lived. My second wife – I’ve been encouraged not to refer to them as ex-wife No. 1 or No. 2...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:03:23 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6E11897D-6FB0-740A-E053-0100007FBC09</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=665C5539-B2DC-489E-BF78-4A90D8360E26&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=665C5539-B2DC-489E-BF78-4A90D8360E26&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Tom Jamesdu1-i-syn Anyone who knows me very well will tell you that I’m not the most fastidious man that ever lived. My second wife – I’ve been encouraged not to refer to them as ex-wife No. 1 or No. 2 – told me once that I’d raised myself and done a really lousy job of it. Now, I didn’t take offense at her remark because I figured that if I was still livin’, I hadn’t done that bad a job and she was certainly welcome to her own opinion. As time has passed and my hair has gone from brown to lots of white with a growing bald spot, I’m beginning to see that she may well have been closer to the mark than I thought. I live with a 12-year-old blue heeler named Grace, and our relationship is as close to perfect as I can imagine one being. I love her and she loves me. Just like that. Now, I am responsible for providing for her, and we are both aware of that, on those occasions when I come up short, there are no arguments or passive aggressive days of “silent treatment.” She just informs me immediately about my error and I correct it. My housekeeping skills are few, and seein’ as how I don’t mind much, I don’t mind much. Everything that I own is used hard and I’m prone to wearing clothes way, way past their expiration date. Doin’ laundry today I had to say goodbye to a shirt that I’d been patching since last summer and it was a lot like having to put one of my horses down. I reckon I’ll live and I don’t think they’ve stopped making denim Western shirts, so I can get another to wear way, way past its expiration date. It’s the livin’ with a dog, not bein’ a great housekeeper, wearing clothes that are worn out and a willingness to sleep on the couch in a sleepin’ bag that make me think that Debby may have been right. But hell, other than that, I’m a regular “Spiritual Portal.” Tom James was riding horses before he could walk. He currently hangs his hat in Ignacio. Reach him at outlivedthemallsofar@gmail.com. The topknot, by the way, is the last knot tied on a pack saddle.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/noxious-weed-management-underway-in-mancos/</link>
        <title>Noxious weed management underway in Mancos</title>
        <description>Heather Alvarez of Mancosdu1-i-syn In May, the town of Mancos received a letter from Montezuma County urging us to better manage the noxious weeds that have proliferated over the last few years on town-owned parks, and to encourage property owners...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:03:16 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6E11897D-6FAF-740A-E053-0100007FBC09</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D77DB331-3169-4DAF-82A0-1824710A4423&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D77DB331-3169-4DAF-82A0-1824710A4423&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Heather Alvarez of Mancosdu1-i-syn In May, the town of Mancos received a letter from Montezuma County urging us to better manage the noxious weeds that have proliferated over the last few years on town-owned parks, and to encourage property owners within town limits to do the same. The town of Mancos, like other governmental entities in Colorado, must comply with the Colorado Noxious Weed Act, which requires the removal and management of certain undesirable plants which “constitute a present threat to the continued economic and environment value of the lands of the state, and if present in any area of the state, must be managed.” This list of undesirable plants includes weeds that are currently growing in abundance at Boyle Park, such as houndstongue, thistle, black medic, broadleaf plantain and bindweed. For the past three years, at the request of its citizens, Mancos has severely limited its use of chemical fertilizers and herbicides at Boyle Park in favor of organic methods. The town regularly aerates, overseeds and mows the turf to 3.5 inches. Fertilizers and herbicides approved by the Organic Materials Review Institute are also used, and the town has attempted to hire seasonal employees to help manually remove weeds. Volunteers have periodically made an effort to pull weeds in the park as well. Many of these efforts have significantly increased expenses to the town, and yet the weeds have come back in abundance this year. The Mancos Town Board recognizes the important role the town must play in reclaiming weed-infested areas and removing noxious weeds and non-native plant species to help protect ecosystem integrity and the surrounding area’s native plant diversity. Additionally, the town is committed to maintaining healthy turf grass in Boyle Park because that is the best defense against weeds. Thus, at the May 9 board meeting, upon learning about the weed infestation and the results of staff research, the town board decided to have Boyle Park treated with a traditional herbicide on June 5. The town notified citizens by posting signs at the park, sending out an email message to its email list subscribers and posting information on its website. Although experts recommend staying off the treated areas for four hours, the town closed the park for the day to ensure its safe use. The board opted not to treat one section of the park, which is the area south of the playground and west of the pavilion and sidewalk for those who want to enjoy an area of the park that has only been treated organically. This area will still be maintained using the organic methods previously described and the town is soliciting volunteers to help to pull noxious weeds from this section. Noxious weeds are a threat to natural resources and can be materially damaging to the land of neighboring property owners. As mentioned in the Colorado Noxious Weed Act, croplands, rangeland and habitat for wildlife and native plant communities are being destroyed by noxious weeds each year. The town of Mancos must do its part to mitigate this threat and be a responsible land steward. The town remains committed to moving to alternative, chemical-free options for maintenance of Boyle Park as described in its 2015 Integrated Pest Management Plan, which can be found at our website, www.mancoscolorado.com, and will continue to keep the citizens informed of its progress throughout the year. Heather Alvarez is the town administrator, town clerk and treasurer of the town of Mancos. Reach her via www.mancoscolorado.com.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/parker-roseannes-ouster-shows-times-are-changing/</link>
        <title>Parker: Roseanne’s ouster shows times are changing</title>
        <description>Parkerdu1-i-syn WASHINGTON – Roseanne Barr’s appeal has so long eluded me that her further fall from disgrace has failed to dislodge even the slightest pebble of pity, though pitiful she is. It seems too facile to call her merely racist,...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 18:03:33 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6DDA2E8E-B50D-4C9E-E053-0100007FC6B4</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=8A670D12-3669-419D-984A-8B901DB6C0B2&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=8A670D12-3669-419D-984A-8B901DB6C0B2&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Parkerdu1-i-syn WASHINGTON – Roseanne Barr’s appeal has so long eluded me that her further fall from disgrace has failed to dislodge even the slightest pebble of pity, though pitiful she is. It seems too facile to call her merely racist, which her recent tweet about former White House adviser Valerie Jarrett plainly establishes. Barr said that Jarrett was the result if the “muslim brotherhood & planet of the apes had a baby,” amusing approximately no one. No, Barr is more than an Ambien-enhanced racist; she’s what happens when a struggling network (ABC) sells out in a bid to capture Donald Trump’s base. If executives had but tuned into Barr’s Twitter account sooner, they’d have known she was a Trumpster suffering conspiracy fever. Then again, maybe they did know and didn’t care. Ratings, baby, ratings are all that matter. Barr has apologized six ways from Sunday. In later tweets, she recalled begging ABC President Ben Sherwood not to cancel the recently resurrected show, saying that she thought Jarrett, who served eight years as a senior adviser to President Obama, was actually white. She added that Jarrett “looks like my family!” Sure. And did she also think that Jarrett was, what, a Presbyterian and not really a Muslim, as people on the fringe-right have long held? No, Barr was obviously tapping into the conspiracy theory that Jarrett, who was born to African-American parents living in Iran, is Muslim – and the racist’s persistent belief that blacks are inferior and less evolved than whites. This is such an enduring, dehumanizing trope of racists that it requires no further elucidation. That Barr, whose own knuckles must be raw from strolling the subterranean sewers of her foul dreamscape, should select the ape and the terrorist Brotherhood to represent Jarrett’s parentage is, in Sherwood’s words, “egregious and unforgivable.” But, the Ambien made her do it! This was one of the explanations Barr offered, as she frantically rifled through her primordial psyche in search of a credible excuse. Ambien, an insomnia medicine, may help you sleep, but it doesn’t make you a mean, ugly person. Those conditions would be considered pre-existing – and the “Ambien haze” to which Barr referred, a release of the inherent being. As the drug’s maker tweeted in a comic line that Barr might study: Racism is not a known side effect of Ambien. The overwhelming condemnation of Barr’s remarks via social and other media has proved at least one thing: Racism won’t be tolerated in this country ever again. We can infer this because Barr made a similar racist remark in 2013 about then-national security adviser Susan Rice with little disapproval. With her familiar classiness, Barr tweeted that Rice, also African-American, was “a man with big swinging ape balls.” Who thinks like this? Racists, that’s who. Nevertheless, some have leapt to Barr’s defense. A joke is a joke, they say, and bad ones shouldn’t be show-stoppers. Free speech, y’all, comes the chorus from quarters where the First Amendment is only selectively admired. Speech is free, all right, but it doesn’t mean free from consequences – and free markets decide what sells. It didn’t take guts for ABC to cancel “Roseanne,” despite its high ratings (see Donald Trump’s praise) and its 18 million viewers in the first week. It took only a modicum of humanity, and, of course, the understanding that advertisers and audiences would no longer support the show. Frankly, after Barr’s screeching, crotch-grabbing (no wonder she likes Trump) massacre of the national anthem in 1990, as well as anti-Semitic comments and her subsequent remark about Rice, she didn’t deserve another shot at America’s laugh track. No doubt, Barr’s anguish over about the consequences shared by her cast and co-stars is sincere. But bottom line: There is no excuse. While Barr’s tweet about Jarrett may have revealed her darkest thoughts, her attempts to cover herself reveal who and what she is. Inadvertently, the incident also highlighted who Valerie Jarrett is: a strong, intelligent, well-educated, service-driven, thoughtful, warm and charming woman of historic significance. One hopes that Jarrett, whom I count as a friend, is also impervious to the Barrs of the world. Regrettably, these include the current president, who rose to office on the racist “birther” myth about Obama’s origins and was elected despite a long history of moral turpitude and alleged sexual abuse. On a positive note, Trump and Barr are to be credited with shining a light on America’s underbelly and uniting decent Americans in common cause. Unlike in earlier times when racism or sexism were shouted out, social media and the recent momentum of two relevant movements – #MeToo and #BLM – suggest that times are, indeed, changing for good. No excuses. In the meantime, Jarrett floats above the fray with grace and dignity, seeking ways to make this a teaching moment, and reminding us of what true leadership looks like. Kathleen Parker writes a twice-weekly column on politics and culture for The Washington Post. She received the Pulitzer Prize for Commentary In 2010. Reach her at kathleenparker@washpost.com. © 2018 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/the-globalization-of-threats-is-an-unavoidable-fact/</link>
        <title>The globalization of threats is an unavoidable fact</title>
        <description>du1-i-syn WASHINGTON – Those who find “globalists” to be villains should attend to recent events in Congo. In the remote region of a remote country, government agencies and international institutions identified by sterile acronyms are working to prevent the spread...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 15:05:34 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6CF69B93-575D-1761-E053-0100007FABEE</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D2C922B3-6396-49EB-82C0-7D02637BB275&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D2C922B3-6396-49EB-82C0-7D02637BB275&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[du1-i-syn WASHINGTON – Those who find “globalists” to be villains should attend to recent events in Congo. In the remote region of a remote country, government agencies and international institutions identified by sterile acronyms are working to prevent the spread of a disease that could result in the swift globalization of panic. This week could well prove decisive in Congo’s current Ebola outbreak, which started in April and, at this writing, counts 40-some probable and confirmed cases. If the disease remains largely rural and grows by ones and twos, contact tracing and the use of an experimental vaccine are likely to remain on top of things. If there are outbursts in multiple parts of the city of Mbandaka – which counts more than 1 million people – or clusters are found downriver in Kinshasa, it will mean trouble. The good news? The response to this outbreak, according to National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis Collins, is “vastly further along” than four years ago in Liberia and Sierra Leone. Last time, the World Health Organization was slow, confused and ineffective. This time, teams from WHO and Doctors Without Borders were quickly on the scene. WHO’s new director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, visited the site of the outbreak within weeks. Stockpiles of the vaccine being deployed had already been prepositioned in Liberia and Mali, with the help of the global vaccine alliance GAVI. Congo’s health minister, Oly Ilunga Kalenga, has been in daily contact with Anthony Fauci’s staff at the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. (When I talked to Fauci, Kalenga had contacted him 15 minutes before with a request). All involved knew this day would eventually come, and they have been preparing for it. There are serious challenges in responding to a highly infectious disease in the rural equateur province, parts of which can only be reached by helicopter. But medical authorities have some new tools, including the more aggressive use of experimental drugs. The vaccine VSV-ZEBOV seemed dramatically effective during the West African outbreak four years ago, but circumstances did not allow for a controlled trial. About 4,000 doses are now in Congo – with perhaps 3,000 more on the way – and health authorities are in the process of creating a cold chain of refrigeration to deliver the drugs where they are needed. They will be deployed in a strategy called “ring vaccination,” in which anyone who has been in contact with an Ebola victim, and anyone who has been in contact with those contacts, is vaccinated. Congo has had eight outbreaks of Ebola before this one, and each of them was eventually defeated. A lot of good people, representing a number of global institutions, are working to ensure that the ninth ends the same way. Like tremors before the “big one,” every defeated outbreak provides a frightening hint at what an epidemic might look like. The West African Ebola outbreak of 2014 took about 11,000 lives. If it had spread into the cities of Nigeria, the levels of death and global panic would have spiraled beyond control. But this is not even the worst prospect. A flu pandemic – with a strain that is easily transmitted and has a high mortality rate – could take tens of millions of lives. When it comes to health, the world has become a single, massive body. A serious infection arriving at the weakest part of the immune system, say the health systems of West Africa, can easily spread to the whole. This argues for strengthening our health defenses in remote places. And it will require vaccines that can ring a disease and make a global immune response more effective. At NIH, Collins has been pushing hard for the development of a universal flu vaccine, which would be broadly protective against pandemic strains. Funding that effort could end up the most important spending in the entire budget. The globalization of threats – from terrorism to pandemic disease – is a bare, unavoidable fact. And it will only be met and mastered by determined, heroic globalists. Michael Gerson is a columnist for The Washington Post. Reach him via e-mail at michaelgerson@washpost.com. © 2018 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/singletary-speedy-credit-card-transactions-dangerous-for-consumers/</link>
        <title>Singletary: Speedy credit card transactions dangerous for consumers</title>
        <description>MIchelle Singletarydu1-i-syn WASHINGTON – In hawking its iPhone X, Apple produced a pretty fly commercial. Fly as in stylish. Or, “totally lit,” as teens say. Apple’s “Fly Market” ad highlights how easy it is to pay with your face. Three...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 19:03:10 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6C6CA201-3BEB-6DE1-E053-0100007F005A</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=DE24C630-A5BD-4273-9F98-DD6BBCFA53C0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=DE24C630-A5BD-4273-9F98-DD6BBCFA53C0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[MIchelle Singletarydu1-i-syn WASHINGTON – In hawking its iPhone X, Apple produced a pretty fly commercial. Fly as in stylish. Or, “totally lit,” as teens say. Apple’s “Fly Market” ad highlights how easy it is to pay with your face. Three seconds. That’s all it takes for the actor to pay for a hat that flies off the rack and onto his head. Another second and he’s got on some cool sunglasses. The shopping spree continues with multiple suits, shirts, stylish shoes, a chair for mama and jewelry. The tagline: “Pay with a glance.” With your face or fingertip, you can now literally get into debt in seconds. For those of us old enough to remember, paying with a credit card used to take some time. The cashier had to reach under the counter to retrieve the credit card swiping machine. You had to place your card in the device, then the cashier needed to press down hard to move a gizmo back and forth to make an imprint of your card with carbon copies. Then you signed with other customers looking on and wondering what in the world was taking so long. Go further back, and you might recall a time when merchants had to make a phone call to the bank to make sure the customer was approved. The credit card imprint machine has gone the way of the dinosaurs in the digital age. But at least you still had to sign your name for credit purchases. But soon, we will no longer even need to do that. MasterCard, Visa, Discover and American Express have given merchants the option of requiring signatures. MasterCard announced in April that merchants in the U.S. and Canada no longer must make cardholders sign for in-store credit or debit purchases. Discover no longer requires “point-of-sale signatures” for credit and debit transactions on its network in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean. American Express won’t require any of its merchants around the globe to collect signatures. Citing the migration to chip technology for credit cards, Visa also said it was making signatures optional for its merchants in North America with chip readers. But not for an Apple-pay second do I believe security concerns are the primary reason for the retiring of our signatures. “The goal is to speed customers through checkout lines,” MasterCard said. Trevor Noah, the host of “The Daily Show” on Comedy Central, recently commented on the absurdity of the notion that signing your name is inconvenient. “It’s not like children are saying, ‘Daddy can you spend more time with us,’” and, the dad is forced to say, ‘I would, but I’ve got to sign all these receipts. Damn you, American Express,’” Noah joked. Sure, credit card security is a big concern for merchants and consumers. But it’s also true that the faster the credit transactions, the less time you have to consider your purchases. Speed is not your friend when spending. When you use cash, there’s often a prick of pain at the handing over of real money. For some, that sting may give them pause. But as we create faster ways to pay, we’ll get too numb to the cost of credit. “Our lack of awareness of spending may be the scariest thing about the more and more sophisticated ways with which companies are seducing us into avoiding the pain of paying,” write Dan Ariely and Jeff Kreisler in “Dollars and Sense: How We Misthink Money and How to Spend Smarter.” Two-thirds of cardholders have carried a balance within the past six months, according to a recently released survey by CreditCards.com. Only 39 percent of these credit users even know how much interest they are paying for the balances they are carrying forward. Our scribbled signatures have become perfunctory. Most of us sign our names so illegibly that it’s useless in proving our identity. Still, it’s not a good thing that “sign here” may soon become a distant memory. The act of signing for credit means something. It’s an opportunity to realize that you’re going into debt, even if temporarily. So, no, we shouldn’t be cheering a speedier checkout process online, on our phones or in person. Because it’s in our pauses that we make better financial decisions. Michelle Singletary is a columnist for The Washington Post. Reach her at michelle.singletary@washpost.com. © 2018, Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/brown-access-to-international-trade-critical-for-colorado-ranchers-and-farmers/</link>
        <title>Brown: Access to international trade critical for Colorado ranchers and farmers</title>
        <description>Don Brown If you live in Colorado, or if your business is touched in any way by any aspect of the agricultural industry, the ongoing national discussion about trade agreements and import tariffs should mean a lot to you. Colorado...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 20:04:12 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6B57E661-1E02-29E6-E053-0100007F5000</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=2273C2BE-84DE-4351-915B-74820258DCE3&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=2273C2BE-84DE-4351-915B-74820258DCE3&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Don Brown If you live in Colorado, or if your business is touched in any way by any aspect of the agricultural industry, the ongoing national discussion about trade agreements and import tariffs should mean a lot to you. Colorado farmers and ranchers understand that there are a lot of things like weather and market price fluctuations that we can’t control. But we can make every effort to create new market opportunities and expand the global partnerships we have worked so hard to develop for our products. We all need to work together to protect our state’s position in international markets. The Colorado farm community can’t afford to wait quietly for Washington to put forth a comprehensive trade strategy. While we wait, our global competitors are moving aggressively to formalize trade pacts to put them at a competitive advantage to the U.S. It’s not right to force our hard-working farmers and ranchers to stand idle while this political drama plays out. Colorado ranchers and farmers need free and open access to international markets, as well as trade agreements that help us advance our export relationships. Over the last few years, Colorado agriculture helped lead our state out of the Great Recession, the worst recession since the Great Depression, and a big part of that was our ability to trade with more than 100 countries that purchase Colorado food and agricultural products. Exports of food and agricultural products from Colorado have quadrupled in the past 20 years. Agriculture is one of Colorado’s top economic sectors, creating approximately 173,000 jobs in our state. And it’s not just farm and ranch families impacted by the free trade discussion. If our markets are shut down, it will impact the dealerships where farmers buy farm equipment, the coffee shops where they eat lunch, the gas stations where they fuel up and the banks where they do business. According to the U.S. International Trade Administration, every billion dollars of exports supports more than 5,220 jobs. And every dollar of exports creates an additional $1.14 of economic activity for Colorado citizens. The North American Free Trade Agreement is vital for the well-being of Colorado and the United States. As U.S. farm incomes decline, the export market is often what keeps our rural communities afloat. In Colorado, nearly all of our 33,800 farms and ranches are family-owned. These are your friends and neighbors working long hours in the cold and heat to produce food for your family’s table. We all need to raise our voices to oppose new tariffs and protect American farmers from the retaliation that will surely come from our trading partners with the imposition of tariffs on their products entering the U.S. Not only would these tariffs hurt our farmers and ranchers, but import tariffs raise prices to American consumers. I am working collaboratively across agriculture, including Farmers for Free Trade, to help farmers and ranchers speak up in support of trade that expands export opportunities and strengthens US agriculture. You can get involved at farmersforfreetrade.com. Multiple generations of my family have worked the same land in Yuma County for over a century and we can appreciate the complex problems Colorado ranchers and farmers face during difficult times. When prices of commodities such as wheat and corn drop to 1980s levels, and with the costs of operating that farm remains at 2017 levels, there is often a very fine line between a good year and a year when a family struggles to make a living. The hard-working families making a living on our ranches and farms simply can’t afford to have their share of export revenue reduced. They are asking only for the right to trade in a fair and free global marketplace. Don Brown was appointed Colorado commissioner of agriculture in January 2015.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/waldman-and-sennott-the-crisis-in-journalism-has-become-a-crisis-of-democracy/</link>
        <title>Waldman and Sennott: The crisis in journalism has become a crisis of democracy</title>
        <description>By Steven Waldman and Charles Sennott Shortly after starting as a newspaper reporter in the coal-fields region of eastern Kentucky, Will Wright wrote an alarming article about how residents hadn’t had running water for five days. One woman talked about...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:26:49 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6A3814EF-2848-3A4E-E053-0100007F4EF6</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=8A0D64CF-5F4A-48C6-8F95-41B756B79D93&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=8A0D64CF-5F4A-48C6-8F95-41B756B79D93&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[By Steven Waldman and Charles Sennott Shortly after starting as a newspaper reporter in the coal-fields region of eastern Kentucky, Will Wright wrote an alarming article about how residents hadn’t had running water for five days. One woman talked about how her husband’s grandfather could no longer bathe; another said the water hadn’t been safe for a long time: “You turn it on, and it smells like bleach.” One month later, the man overseeing the troubled water system in that part of Appalachia abruptly retired. Then, the state “found” $3.4 million to help fix the problem. The articles Wright wrote this year for the Lexington Herald-Leader were not months-long investigations. He attended community meetings in this usually under-covered part of the state and interviewed residents. His articles illustrate an often neglected point about journalism today: The key solution is not technology. It’s having more reporters – a lot of them – on the scene. Journalism faces many problems. Trust in the press is declining. Americans increasingly turn to partisan sources for information. The editorial staff at The Denver Post took dramatic steps recently to draw attention to the crisis in community journalism. After another round of severe layoffs were announced, the staff published an attack on its owners, arguing that the private investment firm that controls its newspaper chain had no interest in supporting local journalism. An editorial, “News Matters: Colo. should demand the newspaper it deserves,” included a photo of the staff shortly after it won a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of the Aurora shooting in 2013 – with more than half of the staff blackened out to indicate that they no longer worked there. This experience is typical. From 1990 to 2016, the number of newspaper employees in the United States dropped from 456,300 to about 183,000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Those numbers understate the decline in many areas. For example, in the 1990s, the San Jose Mercury News, a major newspaper in Northern California, employed 400 union-represented journalists. But in a recent count by the newspaper union, the number of unionized newsroom staffers in the South Bay for Bay Area News Group, which includes the Mercury News, was down to 41. The crisis in journalism has turned into a crisis of democracy. In concrete terms, what does that really mean? First, the reporter shortage means residents don’t have the information to make decisions for their families or hold institutions accountable. They don’t know if their schools are underperforming or their mayor is corrupt or their courts are fair. Residents walk into the voting booth carrying only small shards of information about the local candidates. That is, if they bother to vote. Several studies have shown that voting turnout declines as reporting does. The paucity of reporters has triggered an invisible power shift toward elected officials. A Pew Research Center study of Baltimore showed an increase in local stories based on press releases from elected officials. The trends in journalism exacerbate the divide between the coasts and the rest of the country. In 2014, almost 1 out of 5 U.S. reporters worked in New York, Washington or Los Angeles, compared with 1 in 8 in 2004. Isn’t it likely that this contributed to the media missing the two biggest stories of the past few years – the rise of the opioid epidemic in middle America and the political strength of Donald Trump? In addition, with less local reporting, residents come to understand each other less. Fellow citizens become caricatures rather than neighbors – and we become more polarized. People rely more on national sources, which tend to be ideologically driven. By contrast, local issues – Why are there so many traffic deaths at Maple and Main? How do our teacher salaries compare with the rest of the state? – often cross party lines. Finally, the lack of reporters helps erode trust in journalism. Residents would be less likely to view “the media” as arrogant, ideologically driven miscreants if they see real reporters at school board meetings until midnight, covering nitty-gritty stories of importance to them. You might think, well, sure – more reporters would be nice. But that’s not going to happen within the commercial model. Actually, it can happen if we think differently. Let’s consider how transformative a public service model could be. For instance, Report for America, a nonprofit initiative established last year as part of the GroundTruth Project, recruits talented emerging reporters – like Will Wright – from around the country, and then places them in local newsrooms. Report for America pays half the salary, and the other half is split between the news organization and local donors. News organizations, both commercial and nonprofit, apply to host these corps members. Our goal is 1,000 reporters in the field by 2022. To underline their public service commitment, the reporters also do volunteer projects – for instance, working in high schools to help with student-run news websites or podcasts. Implicit in this approach: The nonprofit sector should play a bigger role in local journalism. In 2012, foundations put $2.1 billion into arts and culture but just $36.1 million into investigative reporting. Whether it’s Report for America or some other model, a sea change is required: Local donors – and the community as a whole – need to view journalism as essential as local libraries, museums and hospitals. It’s not complicated. We need more reporters – not for the sake of journalism but for the health of America’s democracy. Steven Waldman is president and co-founder of Report for America. Charles Sennott, co-founder of RFA, is chief executive of the GroundTruth Project.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/tingey-reauthorize-the-lottery-continue-funding-our-way-of-life/</link>
        <title>Tingey: Reauthorize the lottery, continue funding our way of life</title>
        <description>Sarah Tingey Colorado’s public lands have enormous influence on our state’s culture and economy, and the state’s place for adventure is also why I’m proud the business my husband and I own, Alpacka Raft, is located here. Our company, employees...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 17:35:35 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">696E3650-B315-5313-E053-0100007F0848</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=5FC2ECE7-E754-4058-8C35-DA7CEF327753&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=5FC2ECE7-E754-4058-8C35-DA7CEF327753&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Tingey Colorado’s public lands have enormous influence on our state’s culture and economy, and the state’s place for adventure is also why I’m proud the business my husband and I own, Alpacka Raft, is located here. Our company, employees and community are tied to Colorado’s rivers and iconic landscapes. We are fortunate to have a unique funding source for these resources: the state’s Lottery Division, which directed almost $135 million in lottery proceeds to outdoor projects in 2016. However, the Lottery Division is set to expire in 2024. If that happens, Coloradans will lose a critical resource for preserving our parks and forests. Fortunately, the Colorado Senate just passed Senate Bill 18-066, which would reauthorize the Lottery Division. Our very own Sen. Don Coram, R-Montrose, has sponsored the bill. The House will take up the measure this month. State legislators should pass the measure quickly to ensure the continued support for Colorado’s great outdoors. In 1992, Coloradans passed a constitutional amendment to invest profits from the state lottery into outdoor recreation and conservation. Under the initiative, the Lottery Division directs 40 percent of the proceeds to the Conservation Trust Fund, which supports local government projects, and 10 percent to Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Up to 50 percent goes to Great Outdoors Colorado to preserve and enhance the state’s parks, trails wildlife, rivers and open spaces. Colorado has benefited immensely from the 1992 initiative. According to a recent study, GOCO and the Conservation Trust Fund have supported almost 12,000 jobs over the past decade. GOCO alone has invested $1.1 billion worth of grants into 5,000 projects across the state during the last 25 years – all without spending a single taxpayer dollar. These investments aren’t just numbers, though. They’re positively influencing local communities across the state. Take Montezuma County where I live. In the past 25 years, GOCO has supplied 55 grants worth almost $10 million. This money has funded everything from parks to conserving important wildlife habitats. In 2016, for example, GOCO awarded the Montezuma Land Conservancy a grant to preserve land encompassing miles of recreational trails and connecting two adjacent parks. This commitment to the conservation of landscapes and access to the outdoors is part of why Alpacka Raft moved to Mancos in 2008. We are proud to operate a business here, and over the past 10 years, have become a major employer in our local community. Preservation of Colorado’s rivers and public lands is fundamental to not only our business, but also to our employees’ and community’s way of life. For example, Alpacka Raft runs a summer internship for Mancos High School students. In addition to introducing these interns to career possibilities in the outdoor industry, we also provide them with an introduction to packrafting and watersports. In 2017, GOCO provided a $110,000 grant to the Mancos Elementary School to rebuild their playground to add more natural features and an outdoor classroom. Elementary students who benefit from these GOCO funds and a broader outdoor education will make excellent candidates as future employees at Alpacka Raft or elsewhere in the outdoor industry. We can’t take Colorado’s landscapes for granted. The funding that comes from Colorado’s state lottery is crucial to preserving our rivers, trails and wildlife, not to mention our local economy. Colorado’s natural beauty is already paying huge dividends. The state’s outdoor recreation economy generates almost $10 billion and 229,000 jobs each year. U.S. News and World Report just named Colorado’s economy the best in the nation, no doubt in part because of this access to the outdoors. But these successes will only be sustainable with the reauthorization of the Lottery Division. Fortunately, coalitions like Keep It Colorado – which have support from nonpartisan groups like The Nature Conservancy – have begun to spur support for reauthorization. Let’s protect what makes Colorado special. Tell your local lawmaker to vote for SB 66, and we can continue preserving Colorado’s lands and waters. For more information, visit keepitco.org. Sarah Tingey is the Outreach and Operations Director at Alpacka Raft. She lives in Mancos, Colorado.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/cooper-teachers-wanted-iso-collaborators-team-players-life-long-learners/</link>
        <title>Cooper: Teachers wanted – ISO collaborators, team players, life-long learners</title>
        <description>Scott Cooper It’s hiring season for the Dolores School District. “Teachers wanted!” Every spring we are recruiting for the best teachers willing to embrace the challenges of educating our outstanding students. The most important indicator of a student’s scholastic success...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 17:03:24 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">690CA066-4044-2377-E053-0100007FC737</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=3BB29227-33E1-428D-9582-3F7D33490C16&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=3BB29227-33E1-428D-9582-3F7D33490C16&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Scott Cooper It’s hiring season for the Dolores School District. “Teachers wanted!” Every spring we are recruiting for the best teachers willing to embrace the challenges of educating our outstanding students. The most important indicator of a student’s scholastic success depends on the teacher. Knowing this, we are continually improving our schools to attract and retain high-quality educators. In Dolores, we recognize that in order for our students to be successful, our teachers need to be successful. We have dedicated significant resources toward supporting teachers through relevant, teacher-requested professional development. Our district has 15 days paid beyond the instructional days for professional development, professional collaboration and prep days for all teachers. We deeply value teacher collaboration, and our small district’s single K-12 campus creates the ideal conditions for collaboration across grades and for creating continuum of success for our students. Our small campus creates a family feel and allows us to keep class sizes small to foster personalized attention and instruction for each student. Our district is also committed to fostering personal success for students. We do this by providing additional adult support to help students address a multitude of barriers to learning. We have additional trained professionals to support students’ social-emotional needs. We also provide students with one-on-one technology to support their learning and give our students the ability to explore the world beyond our small mountain town. All our classrooms are fully integrating “Google classrooms,” and the technology teachers help to support student personalized learning. Finally, in Dolores we honor the experience that teachers bring to our district. We accept up to 10 years of prior experience, then provide a half-step credit for additional years. If you are the next great teacher to hire, or you know someone who is, please apply through our website at doloresschools.org. Thank you for taking time to read about teacher recruitment in Dolores. Scott Cooper, Ed. D., is the superintendent of Dolores School District RE-4A. Reach him at scooper@dolores.k12.co.us and 882-7255. Visit doloresschools.org for more information. The RE-4A Education Update appears in The Journal on the first Friday of every month.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/jollon-gun-violence-is-a-public-health-issue/</link>
        <title>Jollon: Gun violence is a public health issue</title>
        <description>According to the Colorado Health Information Dataset, 781 people died from gunshot wounds in Colorado in 2016, more than died from motor vehicle accidents. Of those killed with guns, 605 died by suicide. In La Plata County during the same...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 15:50:27 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">68E59078-75A9-3685-E053-0100007FC506</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=196429B9-F5BB-4464-AE6D-A56AFD9A64F8&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=196429B9-F5BB-4464-AE6D-A56AFD9A64F8&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[According to the Colorado Health Information Dataset, 781 people died from gunshot wounds in Colorado in 2016, more than died from motor vehicle accidents. Of those killed with guns, 605 died by suicide. In La Plata County during the same time period, all eight firearm deaths were by suicide. This data indicate that further research into suicide prevention efforts and promotion of gun safety measures are needed in our state and region. San Juan Basin Public Health facilitates suicide prevention efforts that are led by invested community partners through our State Innovation Model grant funding. Workgroup members in this community-based, collective-impact model may choose to work on gun safety measures that make sense for our community. SJBPH also participates in the statewide Gun Shop Project, a program and research project that connects firearm owners, gun-shop and range owners and public health departments to work together to promote safe gun storage and facilitate difficult conversations about how to talk to friends and family about storing guns during times of stress or crisis to prevent suicide attempts. Gun-related deaths and injuries are a public health issue because they affect both the quality and length of lives across the country. When a common item causes preventable injuries or deaths, research and funding on improving safety often follow. For example, since 1925, there has been a 90 percent decrease in motor vehicle deaths because of a public health response; research suggested using evidence-based prevention tactics such as graduated licenses, speed limits, safer road design and seat belts. A public health approach to reducing gun violence includes: researching gun-related deaths and injuries, identifying risk factors associated with gun violence, identifying protective factors associated with reducing gun violence, then developing, implementing and evaluating communitywide interventions designed to reduce risk factors and increase resilience. Without reliable data on the causes and effects of gun violence, public health entities cannot create evidence-based prevention strategies to reduce gun violence in our communities. Gun violence may have different root causes, as well as varied interventions and prevention techniques, across regions and populations. Allowing public health entities to research and implement violence prevention programs at the state and local levels may therefore result in more tailored and effective programming, designed with community input and participation. Unfortunately, the research needed to guide the direction of future policies to reduce gun deaths and injuries does not exist. In 1996, the Dickey Amendment was introduced into the federal spending bill; it mandated that “none of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.” While not an explicit ban on the CDC’s research on gun violence, the amendment resulted in an immediate reduction of funding for research on gun-related deaths and injuries and little to no subsequent public health research. Organizations such as the American Public Health Association, the American Medical Association, and, most recently, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment have advocated for removing this prohibition on research funding. Historically, public health research and recommendations have led to the creation of programs to address a wide variety of issues, including motor vehicle safety, tobacco use, clean water standards, immunizations and nutrition. An evidence-based, research-informed approach to reducing gun violence in our communities is possible only if public health professionals are funded to research the root causes of violence, effective interventions and prevention strategies. If you would like more information about SJBPH suicide prevention efforts in La Plata County, please contact Dr. Laura Warner, director of Health Promotion, at lwarner@sjbpublichealth.org. For more information about the Gun Shop Project or about suicide prevention efforts in Archuleta County, please contact Kristin D. Pulatie, director of Assessment and Planning, at kpulatie@sjbpublichealth.org. Liane Jollon is executive director of San Juan Basin Public Health serving La Plata and Archuleta Counties. Reach her at ljollon@sjbpublichealth.org.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/thiessen-liberals-dont-hate-america-and-conservatives-are-not-racists/</link>
        <title>Thiessen: Liberals don’t hate America and conservatives are not racists</title>
        <description>Marc Thiessen WASHINGTON – I’m a rock-ribbed conservative who wants Republicans to keep control of Congress. But I’m not unhappy that Republican state Rep. Rick Saccone lost the special election in Pennsylvania’s 18th Congressional District. Why? Because he insulted my...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:24:04 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">68938291-A39F-372B-E053-0100007FC66C</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=55FC519E-3054-4AD2-8513-38B2206DDC1E&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=55FC519E-3054-4AD2-8513-38B2206DDC1E&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Marc Thiessen WASHINGTON – I’m a rock-ribbed conservative who wants Republicans to keep control of Congress. But I’m not unhappy that Republican state Rep. Rick Saccone lost the special election in Pennsylvania’s 18th Congressional District. Why? Because he insulted my mother. Trailing his Democratic opponent in a district Donald Trump won by 20 points, but which still has more registered Democrats than Republicans, Saccone hit on a genius idea to turn out the vote: At a campaign rally just before voters went to the polls, he declared that liberals hate America and hate God. “I’ve talked to so many of these on the left,” he said. “... And I tell you, many of them have a hatred for our country. ... I’ll tell you some more – my wife and I saw it again today: They have a hatred for God.” My mother is a liberal Democrat, and I can tell you: She does not hate America or God. Quite the opposite; she is one of the most patriotic people I know. She grew up in Nazi-occupied Poland, fought with the Polish underground, was taken to Germany as a prisoner of war, was liberated by Patton’s Army and moved to London. Eventually, she became a doctor and made her way to the United States, where she became a U.S. citizen. There is no one prouder to be an American. When Poland held its first free elections in 1989, Polish Americans living in the United States were invited to vote. Many did so, but my mom refused. She loved the land of her birth, but she was an American citizen now and would not vote in a foreign election. When someone hears her thick Polish accent for the first time, they often ask, “Where are you from?” She answers proudly: “New York City.” She’s also a proud Democrat who voted for Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. We disagree about politics, but we both love America and want to make this country great. We just have different ideas about the best ways to do it. So when Saccone says liberals hate America, he’s talking about my mother. I take it personally. And you should, too. Whether you are liberal, conservative or in between, I’ll bet that you have a loved one who disagrees with you about politics. It might be a sibling or a parent or a beloved cousin, aunt or uncle – or even your kids. We should not stand for politicians from either party who insult them or question their motives or their patriotism. Too often, politicians on both the left and right do just that. We saw this recently when, during an event in India, Clinton insultingly claimed that Trump won the parts of the country that weren’t “moving forward.” She said those voters liked what she characterized as Trump’s message that “you know you didn’t like black people getting rights. You don’t like women, you know, getting jobs. You don’t want, you know, to see that Indian American succeeding more than you are.” If you have a loved one who didn’t vote for Clinton in 2016, you should be offended. I doubt the people you love are against civil rights, or women working, or people of color succeeding. They just thought Clinton was a terrible choice for president – an impression she confirmed with those comments. We see it in the gun control debate that followed the Parkland, Florida, school shooting. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said that if you’re not in favor of immediate action on guns, “you’re an accomplice” to the Parkland killer. Seriously? Do you have a loved one who disagrees with you about gun control? Are they accomplices to mass murder? No, they just disagree that gun control is the solution. The problem exists on both sides of the aisle, and it’s not just politicians. American Enterprise Institute President Arthur Brooks recalls how a few years ago he was giving a speech at a large conservative event. “I said that while my own views are center-right, I have no reason to believe progressives are stupid or evil,” he recalls. “An audience member countered, ‘You’re wrong: They are stupid and evil.’” Progressives are not stupid and evil. Conservatives are not racists and misogynists. Our fellow Americans who disagree with us are not our enemies. They are our fellow Americans who differ with us. And we should not put up with politicians, on the left or right, who can’t seem to understand this. Marc Thiessen, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and former chief speechwriter to President George W. Bush, writes a twice-weekly online column for The Post © 2018. The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/the-utah-headliners-foia-is-the-speedometer-not-the-cop-writing-tickets/</link>
        <title>The Utah Headliners: FOIA is the speedometer, not the cop writing tickets</title>
        <description>du1-i-syn The Utah Headliners Sunshine Week is here, and we who value government transparency are again celebrating the laws that allow us to know what our local, state and federal governments are doing. But laws aren’t as popular as they...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 18:02:14 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6740F59D-5D88-2E9D-E053-0100007FE2F6</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=9D88D8FC-2022-420F-A9F9-3ECC58569CB0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=9D88D8FC-2022-420F-A9F9-3ECC58569CB0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[du1-i-syn The Utah Headliners Sunshine Week is here, and we who value government transparency are again celebrating the laws that allow us to know what our local, state and federal governments are doing. But laws aren’t as popular as they used to be. One person’s reasonable statute is another person’s burdensome government regulation, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is no exception. Look at what the Bureau of Land Management is proposing. The Washington Post recently published a memo in which the BLM, which manages a swath of Utah equal to two-fifths of the state, proposes streamlining a number of environmental reviews and regulations or asks Congress to do so. Nestled within the proposals to eliminate what the BLM considers duplicative and unnecessary regulations holding up oil, gas and mining projects are changes to FOIA. The memo proposes limiting “the number of FOIA requests from any one group” and increasing the fees associated with FOIA requests. The BLM also proposes protecting the information that state and local government share with it. Put another way, the proposal would make a federal agency vital to the health of the West simpler by making it harder to learn what it is doing. It’s not the first time someone has argued that disclosing government happenings is a burden on the government. Back in 2011, as Utah legislators were gutting the state’s public records law through a bill called HB477, one of their arguments was that records requests had become a burden for state and local governments. Utah legislators also made the argument – much as the language in the BLM memo does – that record laws serve the special interest of some “group,” whether that group be journalists or advocacy agencies. Yet, examinations tend to show record laws benefit journalists, advocates and average citizens, and a change to limit one of these groups winds up harming access for everyone. To the Utah legislature’s credit, it realized its mistake and repealed HB477 not long after Gov. Gary Herbert signed it. Here’s hoping the BLM realizes its error before it’s ever made. Saying record laws are a burden on government is like saying the speedometer and fuel gauge are burdens on a car. Both record laws and dashboard displays tell you what their respective vehicles are doing and whether there are problems. The American taxpayers are the ones who gas up the BLM, and restricting FOIA will only make them more ignorant about the decisions being made and why. For that matter, it’s not as if the BLM is buried in FOIA requests. According to the Interior Department’s annual report, the BLM received 1,024 FOIA requests in fiscal year 2017. That’s not much for an agency that manages one-eighth of the country’s land mass. It’s not even among the top agencies receiving requests within the Interior Department. The National Park Service, the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service all received more FOIA requests than the BLM. For further reference, in calendar year 2017, Salt Lake City’s municipal government received 468 record requests through its online filing system. If the BLM really wants to reduce record requests, it could be more proactive. Post more data, correspondence and other records online so FOIA isn’t necessary. But restricting FOIA does a disservice to the people the BLM is working for – those who work on, play on and care for public lands. The proposal also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of FOIA. It’s no burden to tell the people what the government is doing. It’s good government. The Utah Headliners is the state’s largest chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. Learn more at https://twitter.com/UtahSPJ.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/gerson-billy-graham-was-consumed-by-grace-and-gratitude/</link>
        <title>Gerson: Billy Graham was consumed by grace and gratitude</title>
        <description>Michael Gerson, Washington Post Columnistdu1-i-syn WASHINGTON – He was easily the most influential evangelical Christian of the 20th century – a man at home in the historical company of George Whitefield and John Wesley. But this would be hard to...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:28:06 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6627A687-9ABD-5BE7-E053-0100007F68EE</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=AEE20E60-8F6C-4374-BDC0-8846A2D5D4E4&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=AEE20E60-8F6C-4374-BDC0-8846A2D5D4E4&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Michael Gerson, Washington Post Columnistdu1-i-syn WASHINGTON – He was easily the most influential evangelical Christian of the 20th century – a man at home in the historical company of George Whitefield and John Wesley. But this would be hard to tell from reading Billy Graham’s sermons, which even close associates described as ordinary. His books are hardly more memorable. So what was it that compelled hundreds of millions of people to attend and watch his evangelistic “crusades” and to find personal transformation in his words? Graham’s global ministry was the triumph of complete sincerity, expressed with a universally accessible simplicity. “There is no magic, no manipulation,” said publicist Gavin Reid. “The man just obviously believes what he says.” Graham could display charisma in meetings with presidents and queens. In the pulpit – the place of his calling from an early age – he was nearly transparent, allowing a light behind him to shine through him. He had the power of a man utterly confident in some other, greater power. American fundamentalism from the Scopes monkey trial to the 1950s was traumatized, marginalized and inward-looking. Graham’s achievement was to turn the face of fundamentalism outward toward the world – shaping, in the process, a distinct religious movement. His evangelicalism was more open and appealing, more intellectually and culturally engaged. Graham took his fellow evangelicals from the margins to the center – from the sawdust trail to the White House. He managed to be winsome without being compromised. And evangelical Christians felt grateful to have a public representative who, through his integrity and consistency, brought credit to their faith. There was initial resistance to Graham’s work among mainline Protestants. As Graham announced more and more crusades, theologian Reinhold Niebuhr was not amused. Graham, Niebuhr warned, would “accentuate every prejudice which the modern, ‘enlightened’ but morally sensitive man may have against religion.” Graham responded: “I have read nearly everything Mr. Niebuhr has written, and I feel inadequate before his brilliant mind and learning. Occasionally, I get a glimmer of what he is talking about ... (but) if I tried to preach as he writes, people would be so bewildered they would walk out.” Nearly 2 million people walked into Graham’s 16-week, New York crusade in 1957. And Graham was joined one night at Madison Square Garden by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. There was also resistance among some fundamentalists. I grew up in a theologically conservative Calvinist church in which the reformation was refought on a weekly basis. The man who would become my father-in-law – blessed with a fine voice – decided to sing in the choir at a Billy Graham crusade that came into town. Afterward, he was hauled in front of the elders of the church to be questioned. They were upset at this participation because Graham – when people would come forward during the altar call – would refer them back to their home churches, including Catholic churches. In fact, the tone of Graham’s public voice changed over the years, becoming more ecumenical, less harsh and nationalistic. Some of this he credited to broader exposure to the world. “I think now when I say something, ‘How is this going to sound in India? How is it going to sound to my friends in Hungary or Poland?’” But this also involved a theological shift. “I used to believe that pagans in far countries were lost if they did not have the gospel of Christ preached to them,” he reflected in 1978. “I no longer believe that.” His faith in the essentials of the Christian gospel, however, never changed. And it made him into a busy builder of institutions that still carry the Christian message. Graham was instrumental in the founding of Christianity Today, the Billy Graham Center at Wheaton College and Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. He was a major supporter of the National Association of Evangelicals and Fuller Theological Seminary. As in any long, public life, there were low moments, particularly when Graham came into contact with political figures such as Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. But he also had a powerful, positive influence in the life of the young George W. Bush and countless others. And this much is clear: For Graham, faith was not the instrument to some other end; it was the prize itself. He had no ulterior motives. No trace of cynicism. He was consumed by grace and spoke in gratitude. For a Christian, it is not a small thing for a man to talk about Jesus Christ, face to face, to more people than anyone has ever done. Or to see how remarkably God used his servant Billy, just as he was. Michael Gerson is a columnist for The Washington Post. Reach him via e-mail at michaelgerson@washpost.com. © 2018 The Washington Post Writers Group.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/samuelson-what-does-commonsense-immigration-look-like/</link>
        <title>Samuelson: What does commonsense immigration look like?</title>
        <description>Robert Samuelson WASHINGTON – We are a nation of immigrants who are uneasy about immigration. There is a long history of resentment against immigrants, dating to the Irish in the 1840s and the Chinese a few decades later. This contrasts...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 17:03:35 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6480614E-9780-4CD5-E053-0100007FD7B9</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=9419E4B3-FB93-431B-8DBF-A0274CB7BA5E&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=9419E4B3-FB93-431B-8DBF-A0274CB7BA5E&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Robert Samuelson WASHINGTON – We are a nation of immigrants who are uneasy about immigration. There is a long history of resentment against immigrants, dating to the Irish in the 1840s and the Chinese a few decades later. This contrasts with our demonstrated ability to absorb newcomers. It’s time to overcome this two-headed legacy with an immigration policy for the 21st century. What would such a policy look like? Most of the “Dreamers” would receive legal status, as would many other undocumented residents who have led law-abiding lives. In return, there would be tougher border security (including a “wall” or its equivalent) and a requirement that most employers check immigration status through an electronic network. These steps would dramatically reduce the number of illegal immigrants. As for legal immigration, there would be a ceiling of about 1 million annually, which until recently was roughly the level of admissions. But there would be a fundamental change in the criteria for legal immigration, from family connections to workplace skills. The better educated immigrants are, the easier for them to adapt to a new society. There are at least three reasons to support this sort of system. First, the existing system has increased U.S. poverty, driven by inflows of poorly skilled legal and illegal workers. Consider. From 1980 to 2016, the number of people with incomes below the government poverty line rose by 11.3 million (from 29.3 million to 40.6 million). Fully two-thirds of those, or 7.6 million, were Hispanic. Much of this increase clearly reflected the impact of immigrants and their children. Second, the status quo promotes lawlessness and repression that, rightly, offend – for different reasons – those on all sides of the immigration debate. One side sees undocumented immigrants as lawbreakers who should admit their crime and suffer the consequences by being deported. Given the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants, this seems unlikely. The other side views the unending enforcement actions – raids on homes and businesses – as the terrifying tactics of a police state that are unworthy of the United States. There is no way of breaking this stalemate except by starting anew. Third, skilled immigrants are good for the economy. True, they can’t single-handedly boost annual economic growth to 3 or 4 percent from the 2 percent-plus of recent years. But every little bit helps. One area where immigrants shine is entrepreneurship. In a study of new firms, the husband-wife team of economists William Kerr of Harvard and Sari Pekkala Kerr of Wellesley College found that about one-quarter of company founders were immigrants. All this is increasingly relevant because after declining for a few years, immigration is again growing. Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies, a group favoring tighter immigration policies, estimates that new immigrants in 2016 totaled nearly 1.8 million, which, if confirmed by the final count, would tie with 1999 as the highest in history. As a group, there are now more than 43 million immigrants in the United States, legal and illegal, representing about 13 percent of the population, reports the Migration Policy Institute, which generally supports looser policies. The U.S.-born children of immigrants constitute a group almost the same size. This means that about a quarter of the total U.S. population are either immigrants or their offspring. What matters is how easily these new Americans integrate with the old Americans. There’s some good news. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine recently released two studies reporting significant gains among immigrants. Compared with U.S.-born workers, they are experiencing rising wages. More are going to college. Their English proficiency is advancing at historic rates. But there’s a paradox. To make past immigration succeed, you need to limit present immigration. Otherwise, the pressures of coping with new groups becomes more contentious. How is poverty to be reduced if the ranks of the poor are constantly replenished with new immigrant poor? Similarly, more poor immigrant children will strain state and local school budgets. And there’s a whole array of cultural and historic differences between natives and immigrants – and among immigrants themselves. The ability to absorb new immigrants is one of the glories of the American project, but it is not infinite. It must give way to practical realities. The outline of a commonsense immigration policy exists. What’s unclear is whether the Trump administration and its critics have the political courage to translate the general principles into a workable system that balances the needs of new and old Americans. Robert Samuelson is a columnist for The Washington Post. © 2018 The Washington Post Writers Group.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/gerson-trumps-conspiracy-theories-endanger-democracy/</link>
        <title>Gerson: Trump’s conspiracy theories endanger democracy</title>
        <description>Michael Gerson WASHINGTON – Just as Bill Clinton’s 1998 State of the Union address is known as the speech after the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke, Donald Trump’s 2018 State of the Union address is likely to be remembered as the...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:26:15 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">642B596F-2B2E-4D05-E053-0100007F1480</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=635E9D03-2BFC-4CF3-85DC-5EA8862089E0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=635E9D03-2BFC-4CF3-85DC-5EA8862089E0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Michael Gerson WASHINGTON – Just as Bill Clinton’s 1998 State of the Union address is known as the speech after the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke, Donald Trump’s 2018 State of the Union address is likely to be remembered as the speech before Robert Mueller’s report arrived. Clinton remains the gold standard in presidential scandal management: Stubbornly talk in public about “the people’s business.” Ruthlessly destroy the reputations of investigators and hostile witnesses. Tell delaying lies. And dismiss the controversy as a partisan matter – even a partisan conspiracy – in order to solidify support in your party and in Congress. Little about Trump’s response so far deviates from this playbook. The goal is not to provide refuting evidence to potential charges of collusion with Russia and obstruction of justice. It is to shift the grounds of the political debate, making any charges against the president appear trivial, malicious and highly political. The current president’s practice of this strategy, however, is more disturbing and damaging. Trump’s sustained attack on the FBI’s credibility (“in tatters,” he claims) comes in the context of a broad assault on the integrity of American institutions. In a short political career, Trump has maligned the CIA, the electoral system, the media, the federal judiciary and the Justice Department. Any institution that checks him is smeared. In the current case, Trump has reportedly demanded loyalty from law enforcement officials, attacked them after they refused, and suggested to the country that everyone in Washington is as cynical as he is. When Trump is temporarily tamed by a teleprompter, there are political benefits in talking about national unity. But Trump has built his scandal strategy on a foundation of conspiracy theories, targeted by partisan media to the most receptive: “We have a coup on our hands in America,” says Fox News host Jesse Watters. Does Trump believe this? Who knows? In this matter, sincerity is downright scary. It means we have a conspiracy-minded, 71-year-old Fox viewer engaged in a strange feedback loop with conservative cable television– each encouraging the delusions of the other. In the process, Trump is further alienating an already-alienated segment of the population, making them more open to suggestions that he is the victim – not of his own ineptness and corruption – but of sedition. Why is this a danger to democracy? People who believe conspiracy theories cease to believe in the possibility of discourse and deliberation. When the whole game is rigged, debates can only be decided by power. At stake in our political moment is respect for the rule of law itself. A president who doesn’t like being subject to the rules is attempting to discredit the enforcers of the rules. This has been tried before, but seldom with a heavier hand. Perhaps most frightening is how enthusiastically some GOP members of Congress have taken to Trump’s strategy, and how quickly this has intimidated most others in the caucus. There is, according to some Republicans, a “secret society” at work in the FBI, in a plot that is “worse than Watergate.” In one of those shocking ironies that have become commonplace in the Trump era, law-and-order Republicans call on America’s leading law enforcement agency to be “purged” for political reasons. It is the triumph of partisanship over ideology. It is the triumph of partisanship over sanity. No amount of presidential words can change the showdown that now seems inevitable. Based only on what we currently know, Trump’s presidential campaign desired to collude with the Russians. The case for obstruction by the president – apparently demanding loyalty from then-FBI Director James Comey, pressing Comey to lay off of Michael Flynn, firing Comey, boasting that the firing had relieved “great pressure” on him, pushing other administration officials to publicly clear him – seems strong. Actions by the special counsel also hint at the investigation of financial corruption. What if Mueller comes out with a 400-page report, along with five volumes of supporting material, detailing serious offenses in all these areas? Trump has made his response clear: If law enforcement does its job, it will be evidence of a conspiracy to abuse its power. One question, at that point, would dominate our politics: Will Republicans choose to live within this lie? Michael Gerson is a columnist for The Washington Post. Reach him via e-mail at michaelgerson@washpost.com. © 2018 Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/samuelson-does-main-street-remain-hostage-to-wall-street/</link>
        <title>Samuelson: Does Main Street remain hostage to Wall Street?</title>
        <description>WASHINGTON – The stock market is going gangbusters, but whether this reflects the economy’s underlying strength or runaway speculation stumps many experts. Hence, the need for this column: a primer on the red-hot stock market. Will it sustain the economy...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:03:08 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">63F35E17-5D74-24D8-E053-0100007F1CA1</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=824AC7D2-440D-4DBB-A12E-5EE003502DAB&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=824AC7D2-440D-4DBB-A12E-5EE003502DAB&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[WASHINGTON – The stock market is going gangbusters, but whether this reflects the economy’s underlying strength or runaway speculation stumps many experts. Hence, the need for this column: a primer on the red-hot stock market. Will it sustain the economy or ultimately kill it? The boom is undeniable. In 12 out of the first 15 trading days of 2018, stocks reached record highs, with an overall gain of 6 percent, worth about $1.9 trillion, according to Wilshire Associates. Since Donald Trump’s election on Nov. 8, 2016, stocks are up one-third, or $8.4 trillion. Nor is there much quarrel that, at present levels, stock valuations are “stretched.” In layman’s language, this means that stock prices are high relative to company earnings (profits). Since 1936, the median price-earnings ratio for the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index is 17; the present P/E is about 24, says Howard Silverblatt of S&P Dow Jones Indices. Or consider another measure, the “CAPE” index. This stands for “cyclically adjusted price-earnings” ratio. Devised by economists Robert Shiller of Yale and John Campbell of Harvard, it provides a longer view of market behavior. The CAPE averages 10 years of P/Es and corrects for inflation. This index, too, is historically high at 34, which is roughly double the long-term median of 16. With evidence like this, some experts conclude that stocks are overvalued. Writing in The Wall Street Journal, economist Burton Malkiel – author of the classic A Random Walk Down Wall Street – asserts that “all asset classes appear overpriced.” Economist Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics says stocks could be overvalued by as much as 20 percent. What these economists are saying is that euphoric investors are pushing prices higher because they believe everyone else is pushing prices higher. Herd mentality prevails. But sooner or later, this self-deception becomes obvious. Then, stock prices “correct” – a modest decline of, say, 10 to 15 percent – or “crash,” a much larger loss. Since the 1930s, there have been 13 full-fledged bear markets with declines exceeding 20 percent, according to Silverblatt’s figures. Their drops averaged 40 percent. The counter-argument is that something (examples: tax cuts, regulatory policies, new technologies, low interest rates) has brightened the economic outlook, justifying higher stock prices. Trump and his allies have taken this view, arguing that the economy is already strong and that his policies will make it stronger. One skeptic is Shiller. Although conceding in a recent column for Project Syndicate that high U.S. P/E ratios are a “mystery,” he doesn’t credit “the Trump effect.” For starters, he says, the CAPE ratio has been high since 2013; Trump’s policies can’t explain this. The market’s upward march preceded his election. Nor do high P/Es reflect exceptionally rapid growth in profits, Shiller argues. Just the opposite: Adjusted for inflation, profits are only 6 percent higher than a decade earlier. The reality is that stock market booms and busts are often driven by financial innovations that initially seem to make investing safer, argues financial consultant Scott Nations in his absorbing new book A History of the United States in Five Crashes: Stock Market Meltdowns that Defined a Nation (1907, 1929, 1987, 2008 and 2010). For example: In the early 2000s, the “securitization” of mortgages – the packaging of home loans in bond-like securities – was supposed to reduce risk by informing investors of varying loan quality. Perversely, this lulled investors into a false sense of confidence that justified many dubious loans. When this became clear, the economy and stocks collapsed. It’s an open question whether something similar is happening now. The infatuation with bitcoin symbolizes growing speculation, Nations says. Another source of potential instability could be index products – exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or index mutual funds – that allow investors to buy and track a basket of stocks, such as the S&P 500. These index products have grown rapidly in popularity, reflecting low fees and a belief that most investors can’t “beat the market,” so why try? In November 2017, there were 1,828 ETFs and index funds worth a total of $3.3 trillion, up from 923 products worth $1 trillion in 2010, reports the Investment Company Institute (ICI), a trade group. Although index products are investor-friendly, their effect on market trends is not clear. The need to buy and sell huge baskets of stocks may exaggerate swings in both directions, increasing gains in bull markets and losses in bear markets. Still, ICI economist Sean Collins doubts there’s much overall impact, noting that, despite their growth, index products represent only 13 percent of stock-market wealth. What seems clearer is that the market remains vulnerable to unexpected economic or political shocks. A significant decline in stocks would undermine confidence and spending. Main Street is, to some extent, hostage to Wall Street. Robert Samuelson is a columnist for The Washington Post. © 2018 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/samuelson-china-and-the-global-race-for-new-technology/</link>
        <title>Samuelson: China and the global race for new technology</title>
        <description>Robert Samuelson WASHINGTON – The National Science Foundation and the National Science Board have just released their biennial “Science &amp; Engineering Indicators,” a voluminous document describing the state of American technology. There are facts and figures on research and development,...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:03:09 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6366278F-44A8-730E-E053-0100007FCD45</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D74D2ED7-6E7D-48DE-9995-04C6CECD8F5C&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=D74D2ED7-6E7D-48DE-9995-04C6CECD8F5C&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Robert Samuelson WASHINGTON – The National Science Foundation and the National Science Board have just released their biennial “Science & Engineering Indicators,” a voluminous document describing the state of American technology. There are facts and figures on research and development, innovation and engineers. But the report’s main conclusion lies elsewhere: China has become – or is on the verge of becoming – a scientific and technical superpower. We should have expected nothing less. After all, science and technology constitute the knowledge base for economically advanced societies and military powers, and China aspires to become the world leader in both. Still, the actual numbers are breathtaking for the speed of their occurrence. Remember that a quarter-century ago, China’s economy was tiny and its high-tech sector barely existed. Since then, here’s what’s happened, according to the “Indicators” report: China has become the second largest R&D spender, accounting for 21 percent of the world total of nearly $2 trillion in 2015. Only the United States at 26 percent ranks higher, but if present growth rates continue, China will soon become the biggest spender. From 2000 to 2015, Chinese R&D outlays grew an average of 18 percent annually, more than four times faster than the U.S. rate of 4 percent.There has been an explosion of technical papers by Chinese teams. Although the United States and the European Union each produce more studies on biomedical subjects, China leads in engineering studies. American papers tend to be cited more often than the Chinese, suggesting that they involve more fundamental research questions, but China is catching up.China has dramatically expanded its technical work force. From 2000 to 2014, the annual number of science and engineering bachelor’s degree graduates went from about 359,000 to 1.65 million. Over the same period, the comparable number of U.S. graduates went from about 483,000 to 742,000.Not only has Chinese technology expanded. It’s also gotten more ambitious. Much of China’s high-tech production once consisted of assembling sophisticated components made elsewhere. Now, says the report, it’s venturing into demanding areas “such as supercomputers and smaller jetliners.” Of course, there are qualifications. China still lags in patents received. Over the last decade, American firms and inventors account for about half the U.S. patents annually, and most of the rest go to Europeans and Japanese. Recall also that China’s population of 1.4 billion is more than four times ours; not surprisingly, it needs more scientists, engineers and technicians. In a sane world – shorn of nationalistic, economic, racial and ethnic conflicts – none of this would be particularly alarming. Technology is mobile, and gains made in China could be enjoyed elsewhere, and vice versa. But in our contentious world, China’s technological prowess is potentially threatening, as the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a congressional watchdog group, has often pointed out. One danger is military. If China makes a breakthrough in a crucial technology – satellites, missiles, cyberwarfare, artificial intelligence, electromagnetic weapons – the result could be a major shift in the strategic balance and, possibly, war. Even if this doesn’t happen, warns the commission, China’s determination to dominate new industries such as artificial intelligence, telecommunications and computers could lead to economic warfare if China maintains subsidies and discriminatory policies to sustain its firms’ competitive advantage. “Industries like computing, robotics, and biotechnology are pillars of U.S. economic competitiveness, sustaining and creating millions of high-paying jobs and high-value-added exports,” the commission said in its latest annual report. “The loss of global leadership in these future drivers of global growth” would weaken the American economy. Chinese theft of U.S. trade secrets compounds the danger. The best response to this technological competition is to reinvigorate America’s own technological base. For example: Overhaul immigration to favor high-skilled newcomers, not relatives of previous immigrants; raise defense spending on new technologies to counter China; increase other federal spending on “basic research” (government provides most of the money for this research, which is the quest for knowledge for its own sake, and amazingly has cut spending in recent years). “We are involved in a global race for knowledge,” said France Cordova, head of the NSF. “We may be the innovation leader today, but other countries are rapidly gaining ground.” It is hardly surprising that China has hitched its economic wagon to advanced technologies. What is less clear and more momentous is our willingness and ability to recognize this and do something about it. Robert Samuelson is a columnist for The Washington Post. © 2018 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/will-in-oregon-progressivism-spills-over-at-the-pump/</link>
        <title>Will; In Oregon, progressivism spills over at the pump</title>
        <description>WASHINGTON – Frank Lloyd Wright purportedly said: “Tip the world over on its side and everything loose will land in L.A.” Today, however, Oregon is the state with the strangest state of mind, which has something to do with it...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:03:11 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6312F515-ABB5-77C4-E053-0100007FD5D4</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=E2B65DBA-C5E2-4558-86F9-1DCEA8F03A83&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=E2B65DBA-C5E2-4558-86F9-1DCEA8F03A83&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[WASHINGTON – Frank Lloyd Wright purportedly said: “Tip the world over on its side and everything loose will land in L.A.” Today, however, Oregon is the state with the strangest state of mind, which has something to do with it being impeccably progressive: In the series “Portlandia,” the mention of artisanal lightbulbs might be satirical, but given today’s gas-pumping controversy, perhaps not. On Jan. 1, by the grace of God – or of the government, which is pretty much the same thing to progressives – a sliver of a right was granted to Oregonians: Henceforth they can pump gas into their cars and trucks, all by themselves. But only in counties with populations of less than 40,000, evidently because this walk on the wild side is deemed to be prudent only in the hinterlands, where there is a scarcity of qualified technicians trained in the science of pumping. Still, 2018 will be the year of living dangerously in the state that was settled by people who trekked there on the Oregon Trail, through the territory of Native Americans hostile to Manifest Destiny. Oregon is one of two states that ban self-service filling stations. The other is almost-as-deep-blue New Jersey. There the ban is straightforward, no-damned-nonsense-about-anything-else protectionism: The point is to spare full-service gas stations from competing with self-service stations that, having lower labor costs, have lower prices. Oregon’s Legislature offers 17 reasons “it is in the public interest to maintain a prohibition on the self-service dispensing of Class 1 flammable liquids” – aka, gasoline, which you put in your car’s “Class 1 flammable liquids tank.” The first reason is: The dispensing of such liquids “by dispensers properly trained in appropriate safety procedures reduces fire hazards.” This presumably refers to the many conflagrations regularly occurring at filling stations throughout the 48 states where 96 percent of Americans live lives jeopardized by state legislators who are negligent regarding their nanny-state duty to assume that their constituents are imbeciles. Among Oregon’s 16 other reasons are: Service-station cashiers are often unable to “give undivided attention” to the rank amateurs dispensing flammable liquids. When purchasers of such liquids leave their vehicles they risk “crime,” and “personal injury” from slick surfaces. (“Oregon’s weather is uniquely adverse”; i.e., it rains there.) “Exposure to toxic fumes.” Senior citizens or persons with disabilities might have to pay a higher cost at a full-service pump, which would be discriminatory. When people pump gas without the help of “trained and certified” specialists, no specialists peer under the hood to administer prophylactic maintenance, thereby “endangering both the customer and other motorists and resulting in unnecessary and costly repairs.” Self-service “has contributed to diminishing the availability of automotive repair facilities at gasoline stations” without providing – note the adjective – “sustained” reduction in gas prices. Self-service causes unemployment. And “small children left unattended” by novice gas pumpers “creates a dangerous situation.” So there. Oregon’s Solomonic decision – freedom to pump in rural counties; everywhere else, unthinkable – terrified some Oregonians: “No! Disabled, seniors, people with young children in the car need help. Not to mention getting out of your car with transients around and not feeling safe too. This is a very bad idea.” “Not a good idea, there are lots of reason to have an attendant helping, one is they need a job too. Many people are not capable of knowing how to pump gas and the hazards of not doing it correctly. Besides I don’t want to go to work smelling of gas.” The complainers drew complaints: “You put the gas in your car not shower in it princess.” “If your only marketable job skill is being able to pump gas, by god, move to Oregon and you will have reached the promised land.” “Pumped my own gas my whole life and now my hands have literally melted down to my wrists. I’m typing this with my tongue.” These days, civic discourse is not for shrinking violets. To be fair, when Oregonians flinch from a rendezvous with an unattended gas pump, progressive government has done its duty, as it understands this. It wants the governed to become used to having things done for them, as by “trained and certified” gas pumpers. Progressives are proud believers in providing experts – usually themselves – to help the rest of us cope with life. The only downside is that, as Alexis de Tocqueville anticipated, such government, by being the “shepherd” of the governed, can “take away from them entirely the trouble of thinking” and keep them “fixed irrevocably in childhood.” George Will is a columnist for The Washington Post. Reach him by email at georgewill@washpost.com. © 2018 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/rankin-teacher-to-class-can-you-hear-me-now/</link>
        <title>Rankin: Teacher to class: “Can you hear me now?”</title>
        <description>Joyce Rankin “It’s just common sense.” How many times have you heard this phrase and thought “If only more people would just use common sense?” I was thinking that during a conversation with Dan Snowberger, Durango School District 9-R Superintendent....</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:03:11 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6312F515-ABB6-77C4-E053-0100007FD5D4</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=E3DDFF1D-0711-42C2-A95D-CE943723645A&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=E3DDFF1D-0711-42C2-A95D-CE943723645A&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Joyce Rankin “It’s just common sense.” How many times have you heard this phrase and thought “If only more people would just use common sense?” I was thinking that during a conversation with Dan Snowberger, Durango School District 9-R Superintendent. Dan and I, along with a thousand other educators, attended an Excellence in Education conference last month where use of technology in the K-12 classroom was discussed. While there are already lessons available that introduce students, as early as kindergarten, to technology, the conversation turned to middle and high school students’ use of cell phones in the classroom. How can students concentrate on the task at hand when they are on their cell phones texting a friend? The answer for one principal in Snowberger’s district was to ban cell phones in his middle school.” Ban cell phones? That’s impossible, you may be thinking. Evidently not for Shane Voss, Principal of Mountain Middle School (Grades 4-8) in Durango. First, Voss invited parents and interested community members to a screening of a film titled “Screenagers,” describing how the child’s brain develops. The film attempted to explain the result of too much “screen time” or time spent in front of a computer screen or cell phone. At first, parents had some concerns about the importance of phones when they needed to get in touch with their child in an emergency situation. Voss assured parents that there would always be personnel available to answer the office phone during school hours. The emphasis of the new no cellphone rule was to “keep students engaged in the present,” said Voss. “We have a highly collaborative and innovative learning environment,” he said. “The students can now use 100 percent of their energy with the task at hand.” He also added that social bullying during school time has greatly decreased. Voss created a cellphone-free environment that seems to be working. There is a time and place for the teen culture of social media; it’s just not at Mountain Middle School. Technology has its place, but so does focus. Common sense? Yes, coupled with strong leadership and community support. Joyce Rankin serves on the Colorado State Board of Education representing the 3rd Congressional District. Reach her at joycerankinsbe@yahoo.com.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/thiessen-the-10-worst-things-trump-did-in-his-first-year/</link>
        <title>Thiessen: The 10 worst things Trump did in his first year</title>
        <description>Marc Thiessen In his first year in office, President Donald Trump has done many positive things, but his record of conservative achievement has been overshadowed by a whole series of self-inflicted wounds. On Dec. 27, I gave my list of...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:03:13 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">62C662F9-3084-12EE-E053-0100007FA1F7</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=0A867694-F9B3-404F-B747-F525CAB687C7&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=0A867694-F9B3-404F-B747-F525CAB687C7&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Marc Thiessen In his first year in office, President Donald Trump has done many positive things, but his record of conservative achievement has been overshadowed by a whole series of self-inflicted wounds. On Dec. 27, I gave my list of the 10 best things Trump has done in his first year in office. Here are the 10 worst: 10. He has made no effort at bipartisanship. Both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush reached across the aisle in their first year in office, but Barack Obama told Republicans that “elections have consequences” and “I won.” Instead of repeating Obama’s mistake, Trump should have reached out across party lines. Perhaps the “Resistance” would have refused, but Trump would have gotten credit for trying. 9. He has spent more time attacking Republicans than Democrats. Trump needs to expand his Senate majority if he wants to pass his agenda. Yet he spent an inordinate amount of time in his first year at war with members of his own party. 8. He is empowering al-Qaida in Syria. By forging a de facto alliance with Russia and Iran to defeat the Islamic State, Trump is driving Sunni Arabs into the waiting arms of al-Qaida – which is preparing to replace the Islamic State and is much more dangerous. 7. He is giving Miranda rights to captured terrorists. Trump promised to start treating captured terrorists as enemy combatants again, but instead of intelligence-driven interrogation and sending terrorists to Guantanamo Bay, he has continued Obama’s criminal-justice approach to terrorist detention. 6. He has attacked the FBI and the intelligence community. Trump is right to be angry about leaks of private conversations with foreign leaders and the political bias of some individuals involved in the Russia probe. But the vast majority of those in the FBI, the Justice Department and the CIA are good, decent and honorable patriots who deserve the president’s respect. Trump should not undermine our institutions because of the corrupt or illegal actions of some individuals. 5. His noxious tweets undermine his presidency. He overshadowed his policy achievements, his excellent address to Congress and speeches in Saudi Arabia, Warsaw and South Korea by tweeting about Obama “wiretapping” him, gloating over Arnold Schwarzenegger’s failure on “The Apprentice” and attacking the hosts of “Morning Joe.” Trump fails to understand that the power and grandeur of the presidency are greater than any of the smash-mouth tactics that got him into the office. 4. He fired James Comey. If he wanted a change in FBI leadership, he should have announced it the day after the election. Comey’s belated firing led directly to the Mueller probe, which hangs over the Trump presidency like the Sword of Damocles. 3. He has dismissed Russian interference in the 2016 election. During his trip to Asia, Trump said he really believes that when Vladimir Putin tells him Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election, Putin believes it. This is patently absurd. Putin directed Russia’s meddling. It is possible to accept that Russia sought to influence our election without accepting that there was any collusion. The fact that a foreign government tried to undermine our democracy should outrage all Americans, regardless of party - including the president. 2. He stood by Roy Moore. His endorsement of an alleged sex predator was morally indefensible and sent a message to women everywhere that Republicans do not believe that credible allegations of a grown man molesting teenage girls are disqualifying. And that message has been received. Polls show a significant increase in the percentage of women who favor Democrats over Republicans in 2018. 1. He has failed to condemn the alt-right. His “many sides” response to Charlottesville, Virginia, was shameful. There a lot of things about the presidency that are hard, but condemning neo-Nazis isn’t one of them. Trump should be celebrating a year of achievement, but instead his administration is hemorrhaging public support. When Trump took office, he had 45 percent approval. Yet today his approval has dropped 10 points to 35 percent, the lowest of any modern president at this time in his administration. If Trump wants to understand why, he can start with this list. Marc Thiessen is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute; he writes a twice-weekly online column for The Washington Post © 2017 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/samuelson-the-curious-disconnect-between-politis-and-the-economy/</link>
        <title>Samuelson: The curious disconnect between politis and the economy</title>
        <description>WASHINGTON – For President Trump, a lot is riding on the economy in 2018. If it continues to do well, it should bolster his popularity and his claim that he understands it better than his critics. But if it slows...</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 09:59:37 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">624CAB74-160F-1B87-E053-0100007FA746</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=931527B2-C195-464B-BA17-1C0F2290A7D0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=931527B2-C195-464B-BA17-1C0F2290A7D0&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[WASHINGTON – For President Trump, a lot is riding on the economy in 2018. If it continues to do well, it should bolster his popularity and his claim that he understands it better than his critics. But if it slows or drops into a recession, it would weaken that claim – perhaps his strongest selling point. So, what’s the economic prognosis? First, the usual caveat: Presidents have only limited influence over the business cycle, which is heavily driven by outside events, past policies and the Federal Reserve. No matter. People still tend to credit or blame the sitting president for the economy’s performance. For Trump, that’s fabulous news. The economy is thriving, and most mainstream analysts believe it will stay that way through the year. An improving global economy compounds the effect. Consider the forecast from IHS Markit, a consulting firm. It expects U.S. economic growth of 2.6 percent in 2018, better than the 2.3 percent in 2017 and much better than the 1.5 percent in 2016. The unemployment rate, now 4.1 percent, will drop below 4 percent. But inflation won’t worsen. For 2018, consumer prices are expected to increase 1.3 percent, down from 2017’s 2.1 percent. All this recalls the “Goldilocks economy” of the late 1990s, when growth was fast enough to create jobs but not so fast as to stoke sharply higher inflation. More jobs, rising home prices and a surging stock market are boosting “consumer spending, (business) capital expenditures, and housing,” Nariman Behravesh, IHS Markit’s chief economist, told clients. Who gets credit? Democrats can argue that 90 percent of the 17.6 million new jobs since the Great Recession’s low point occurred during Barack Obama’s presidency. Trump supporters can retort that the galloping stock market reflects confidence that his pro-business policies will raise economic growth. The more interesting question is whether events might derail the standard 2018 forecast. There are many possible threats: higher interest rates from the Fed; a financial crisis in China; war on the Korean Peninsula; a surprise leap in inflation. But the clearest danger comes from sky-high stock prices. From the 2016 election to the end of 2017, stocks rose 26 percent, propelled by advances in tech stocks, according to Wilshire Associates. That’s a paper gain of $6.7 trillion. By many standard measures, the resulting prices of U.S. stocks are high. The market’s P/E ratio (stock prices compared to their earnings – that is, their profits) is about 24 for the Standard & Poor’s 500 stocks compared with a historical average of 17 since 1936, reports Howard Silverblatt of S&P. “Stock prices are a source of recession risk,” argue economists Gail Fosler and Edward Logan of the GailFosler Group. Simplified a bit, their theory goes as follows: There’s income and there’s wealth. Income is what people earn from their jobs and their investments; wealth is what they own – mainly homes and stocks. For many years, changes in incomes and wealth moved together. Now, wealth movements have acquired a life of their own, so that shifts in wealth shape the business cycle. When people feel richer, they spend more. When they feel poorer, they spend less. What’s happening, they argue, is that stock prices have outraced income gains. When the resulting “bubble” bursts, paper wealth will be destroyed, spending will slow, and there will be a recession. They think one will occur in 2018, in the second half of the year. Some economists are more pessimistic. They believe that the overvaluation of stocks is global, reflecting widespread easy-money policies of government central banks. “While in 2008 bubbles were largely confined to the American housing and credit markets, they are now to be found in almost every corner of the world economy,” writes economist Desmond Lachman of the American Enterprise Institute in The New York Times. Lachman says he feels fairly confident that stocks will retreat, but not when. What’s striking about the current situation is the huge disconnect between what’s happening in the economy and what’s happening in politics. Politics is unstable and chaotic. Polarization has intensified, and Trump has corrupted political debate with his constant, often-untrue tweets. Meanwhile, economic confidence is strong, and the stock market acts as if it has not a worry in the world. To some extent, the contradictions can be reconciled by Trump’s pro-business tax and regulatory policies. But the gap is too wide for this to be a fully adequate explanation. Someday, the gap may be erased. But how? Will political chaos spoil the economy, or will economic confidence stabilize politics? Robert Samuelson is a columnist for The Washington Post. © 2017 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/parker-with-her-new-role-gretchen-carlson-wins-again/</link>
        <title>Parker: With her new role, Gretchen Carlson wins again</title>
        <description>Kathleen Parker WASHINGTON – If karma is a b—h, then justice is a beauty queen. After recent revelations that the CEO of the Miss America Organization and its pageant scriptwriter were talking trash about past winners, the board fired them...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 17:03:14 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">61F992CA-42C3-1F36-E053-0100007FFD1A</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=1A7417D5-E143-4F4E-9D68-9B4C4F60397E&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=1A7417D5-E143-4F4E-9D68-9B4C4F60397E&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Kathleen Parker WASHINGTON – If karma is a b---h, then justice is a beauty queen. After recent revelations that the CEO of the Miss America Organization and its pageant scriptwriter were talking trash about past winners, the board fired them both and installed Gretchen Carlson, a former Miss America (1989) and Fox News anchor, as its new chair. Carlson, you might say, was in the right place at the right time – one she basically created. It isn’t exaggeration to say that Carlson launched the ongoing anti-harassment crusade when she sued her former boss, Fox News founder Roger Ailes. He left the company, and Fox settled with Carlson for a rumored $20 million. Next, Carlson wrote a book about her experience, Be Fierce, which shined an even brighter light on the frequent and largely ignored incidence of sexual harassment. Now she has been crowned again, this time as the head of the organization that first put her on the national map decades ago. Although she didn’t technically start the #MeToo movement that took over social media several months ago, she should be credited with helping bestir women to find their voices. An idea needs mass and energy to become a movement, and the purging of Fox’s misogynist man cave seems to have been the pebble that caused the ripple that became the tsunami that led to dozens (and still counting) of powerful men being fired nationwide following accusations of sexual misconduct. With her recent anointment, Carlson has come full circle in what must feel like justice for this Stanford graduate and world-class violinist. Always confident and a little bullheaded, by her own accounting, she was an unlikely victim. But her experience at Fox and her many interviews with other women helped her discover a greater purpose. That such nasty disrespect toward women should surface, of all places, at the Miss America Organization is alternately shocking and juicy fruit for the tartly inclined. CEO Sam Haskell and writer Lewis Friedman weren’t merely disrespectful; they were disgusting. Also, simply stupid. It all started in 2014 with an email from Haskell to Friedman about changing the telecast script: “I have decided that when referring to a woman who was once Miss America, we are no longer going to call them Forever Miss Americas ... please change all script copy to reflect that they are Former Miss Americas!” Friedman replied, “I’d already changed ‘Forevers’ to ‘C--ts.’ Does that work for you?” “Perfect ... bahahaha,” Haskell replied. This is doubtless amusing to pageant haters, but outrage from more than 50 former pageant winners muffled the chortles of those who find such remarks entertaining. These apparently included some of the board members, who also have resigned. The emails might have gone unnoticed – and, in fact, did for a few years – were it not for the fact that several million women are in a bad mood at the moment. The irony is that feminists, including the #MeToo cavalry, might be expected to rally alongside Carlson and other Miss Americas to fight the boys-will-be-boys excuse for sexual misconduct. But we’ve learned from past episodes that many feminists suffer selective outrage. The rebuffing of Democratic Sen. Al Franken, notwithstanding, they are hard-pressed to align themselves with beauty queens, whose participation in contests involving a bikini strut and cultivation of an “ideal” woman (circa 1950) is viewed as a symbolic obstacle in the battle for equality. Rallying the troops for Barbie is a hard sell as long as she’s prancing around nearly naked before judges who will decide whether she’s got the right stuffing. Acknowledging this conflict of interests doesn’t change the reality, however, that young women who have put in the time, sweat and investment required to compete in a national competition deserve at least respect, especially from their own organization The contestants may not be everyone’s ideal of womanhood, but whom do they hurt? After nearly 100 years of pageants, there’s no record of a Miss America posing a danger to society. Nor, one may rationally infer, has any winner felt objectified by the $50,000 scholarship money. So, she can’t be married while she holds the title. Nor can she have been pregnant or had an abortion, though no one asks. Are these restrictions really so essential to female autonomy? As an agnostic observer, I suspect that Carlson will make it better and perhaps lead this archaic institution toward a female role model who more closely resembles who we aspire to be. Kathleen Parker is a columnist for The Washington Post. Reach her at kathleenparker@washpost.com. © 2017 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/the-10-best-things-trump-has-done-in-his-first-year/</link>
        <title>The 10 best things Trump has done in his first year</title>
        <description>As we approach the end of President Donald Trump’s first year in office, the list of extraordinary things he has done – for both good and ill – is nothing short of remarkable. Trump inspires such deep emotions in his...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 16:09:27 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">61BBE3F4-6256-449D-E053-0100007F3F80</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=69E7D1E8-55D5-4596-9D0C-CAA3ADF4A18D&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=69E7D1E8-55D5-4596-9D0C-CAA3ADF4A18D&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[As we approach the end of President Donald Trump’s first year in office, the list of extraordinary things he has done - for both good and ill - is nothing short of remarkable. Trump inspires such deep emotions in his critics and supporters that many have struggled to objectively assess his presidency. Some are so blinded by their hatred of Trump that they refuse to acknowledge the good he has done, while others are so blinded by devotion that they overlook almost any transgression. In my columns, I’ve tried to give Trump the credit he deserves when he does the right thing, while calling him out when he does the wrong thing. So, here is my list of the 10 best things Trump has done in his first 11 months. 10. He enforced President Barack Obama’s red line against Syria’s use of chemical weapons. When the regime of Bashar Assad used a toxic nerve agent on innocent men, women and children, Trump didn’t wring his hands. He acted quickly and decisively, restoring America’s credibility on the world stage. 9. He has taken a surprisingly tough line with Russia. Trump approved a $47 million arms package for Ukraine, sent troops to Poland’s border with Russia and imposed new sanctions on Moscow for violating the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. 8. He recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. Four American presidents promised to do it, but only one actually did. This is why the American people elected Trump. He does what he promises to do, for better or for worse - in this case, definitely for the better. 7. He withdrew from the Paris climate agreement. After George W. Bush pulled out of the disastrous Kyoto treaty, U.S. emissions went down faster than much of Europe. The same will be true for Trump’s departure from the Paris accord. Combined with his approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, and opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to exploration, Trump is helping usher in a new age of American energy development. 6. He got NATO allies to kick in $12 billion more toward our collective security. Decades of pleading by the Bush and Obama administrations failed to get NATO allies to meet their financial commitments to the alliance, but Trump’s tough talk and reticence to affirm America’s Article V commitment did the trick. NATO is stronger as a result. 5. He has virtually eliminated the Islamic State’s physical caliphate. Trump removed the constraints Obama placed on our military and let it drive the terrorists from their strongholds. 4. He admitted he was wrong on Afghanistan and reversed Obama’s disastrous withdrawal. In a rare admission, Trump declared, “My original instinct was to pull out ... But all my life, I’ve heard that decisions are much different when you sit behind the desk in the Oval Office. ... A hasty withdrawal would create a vacuum for terrorists.” 3. He enacted historic tax and regulatory reform that has unleashed economic growth. Trump signed the first comprehensive tax reform in three decades and removed the wet blanket of Obama-era regulations smothering our economy. We are now heading into our third consecutive quarter of above 3 percent growth. 2. He is installing conservative judges who will preside for decades. With his appointment of Neil M. Gorsuch, Trump secured a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, and he is moving at record pace to fill the federal appeals courts with young conservative judges. 1. He, not Hillary Clinton, was inaugurated as president. Also, Trump has taken a clear, strong stand against the narco-dictatorship in Venezuela, and he renamed the “Asia-Pacific” the “Indo-Pacific” to include India in the larger task of preventing Chinese hegemony in Asia. The record of achievement suggests that, despite the noxious tweets and self-inflicted wounds emanating from The White House, Trump has the potential to become one of the most consequential conservative presidents in modern American history. The question is: Does this good outweigh the bad? Marc Thiessen is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. © 2017 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/rankin-preparing-colorados-students-for-an-unforeseen-future/</link>
        <title>Rankin: Preparing Colorado’s students for an unforeseen future</title>
        <description>Joyce Rankin I attended the Summit on Education Reform in Nashville, Tennessee. Jeb Bush opened the conference and repeated a quote from the first conference in 2008: “The country’s school system is an 8-track in an iPod world. The irony...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2017 05:03:08 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">616C88B3-B9F3-62C7-E053-0100007FF4F1</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=40A419D5-AAA5-45FC-A0F7-07B98531898B&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=40A419D5-AAA5-45FC-A0F7-07B98531898B&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Joyce Rankin I attended the Summit on Education Reform in Nashville, Tennessee. Jeb Bush opened the conference and repeated a quote from the first conference in 2008: “The country’s school system is an 8-track in an iPod world. The irony is that we’re still an 8-track but the iPod is gone.” Speakers and panelists from across the nation discussed directions education is taking and how our schools can prepare students for an ever-changing future. Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, spoke about school choice and the role of parents in selecting the best school for their children. She continues to be an advocate for school choice to advance opportunities for all children. Several sessions highlighted success stories from students and parents who had taken advantage of school choice in their communities. At the conclusion, Ms. DeVos stated “The rising generation represents 100 percent of our future; let’s give them nothing less than 100 percent of our effort.” In a general session, we heard about the importance of technology courses at all grade levels to prepare for future jobs that we can’t currently define. Jeb Bush described it like a quarterback throwing to a receiver. “You don’t throw directly at the receiver, but where he will be when the ball is caught.” We must teach all students the basics of technology so that they can meet the changing needs of an unforeseen skillset of the future. One speaker said there were over 3.5 million truck drivers in the United States. What will happen when we embrace driverless cars and trucks? This was just one example of how jobs will experience change in the future. It’s important to prepare students to adapt to changes so that the economy thrives and our citizens lead satisfying lives. Colorado currently uses blended learning and online courses to enable students to learn skills that would otherwise be unavailable at their school. An example is a student in middle school currently enrolled in an advanced Calculus course online. He is joined by three other students, in various grade levels, from other school districts across the state. Technology is opening up many opportunities that weren’t available even two years ago. It is also moving so rapidly that we need to teach the basics of computer science beginning in Kindergarten. And yes, there are fun applications currently available, online, for Kindergarten students. Future careers will depend on this knowledge combined with the creativity and flexibility to adapt. The Colorado Department of Education, with community participation, is reviewing the Colorado State Standards and adding new standards for computer science. We need to prepare future teachers by including computer science in all teacher preparation programs. Moving from an “8-track system” will not be easy. However, with “100 percent of our effort” we can give our students a chance for a successful future. Joyce Rankin serves on the Colorado State Board of Education representing the 3rd Congressional District. Reach her at joycerankinsbe@yahoo.com.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/samuelson-gop-tax-cut-erodes-budget-discipline-even-further/</link>
        <title>Samuelson: GOP tax cut erodes budget discipline even further</title>
        <description>Robert Samuelson – The Washington Post WASHINGTON – What I most dislike about the Trump/Republican tax plan is the shameless cynicism with which it has been peddled. Recall how it works: The government borrows $1.5 trillion over a decade and...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 17:03:24 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">60F2E744-0F81-53F7-E053-0100007F0CB0</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=3C1C02B8-1B0A-4CC7-A0AB-8529335BFDDC&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=3C1C02B8-1B0A-4CC7-A0AB-8529335BFDDC&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Robert Samuelson - The Washington Post WASHINGTON – What I most dislike about the Trump/Republican tax plan is the shameless cynicism with which it has been peddled. Recall how it works: The government borrows $1.5 trillion over a decade and instantly uses that money to cut taxes for major constituencies – workers, families, small businesses and big companies. The handouts aim to buy votes. This is borrowing to bribe. It’s not subtle. If it’s not cynical, what would be? Democrats can scream all they want about inequality, but the Republicans will have plenty of money to distribute. The non-partisan Tax Policy Center (TPC) estimates that all income classes will receive cuts and that, in 2018, only 5 percent of taxpayers will experience higher taxes compared with present law. That figure climbs up to 9 percent in 2025. It’s true that the biggest cuts go to the richest taxpayers, but the main reason for that is that these people pay most of the taxes. In 2018, taxpayers with $200,000 to $500,000 of income would represent 6.6 percent of taxpayers, pay 24.1 percent of all federal taxes and would receive a $6,560 tax cut, equal to 2.9 percent of their after-tax income, according to the TPC. By contrast, taxpayers with incomes from $50,000 to $75,000 represent 13.9 percent of taxpayers, pay 6.3 percent of all federal taxes and would receive a $870 tax cut, equal to 1.6 percent of after-tax income. Whether all this shuffling of money has the political effect that Republicans desire remains to be seen. But what’s unusual about the Republicans’ plan is the heavy reliance on borrowed money. Scott Greenberg of the non-partisan Tax Foundation estimates that 27 percent of the Republicans’ tax cuts are financed by more debt. (The rest is financed by ending other tax breaks.) Strictly speaking, this is not new. The government has run deficits for decades. It spends more than it taxes. But until now, no major Republican or Democrat has – as far as I can remember – suggested borrowing amounts that are tied explicitly to tax cuts. You may find this a distinction without a difference. Does it matter whether deficits are the unplanned residual of over-spending and under-taxing? Or are deficits somehow better (worse) if calculated and condoned in advance? Yes, it does matter. Here’s why: It’s probable that, in the past, most members of Congress felt a vague guilt that sanctioning ever larger amounts of federal debt was good for the country. But now, even that sense of embarrassment and self-restraint is fading, as Republicans openly defend their $1.5 trillion giveaway. Budget discipline, already weak, erodes further. The irony is that the $1.5 trillion was intended to check deficit financing. Instead, it has become a political permission slip authorizing at least that much additional borrowing. To be fair, Republicans argue that their tax cuts will pay for themselves by speeding up the economy and generating a gusher of new tax revenues – a claim doubted by many economists. If Republicans had the courage of their convictions, they would have advanced a stand-alone corporate tax reduction (touted as the biggest contributor to growth) financed entirely by ending other tax breaks. As it is, the Republicans send exactly the wrong message. We need more taxes, not fewer. Even with the economy near “full employment,” annual budget deficits total hundreds of billions of dollars, and under present policies, they will expand as more Americans retire and health costs grow. Although we can’t know the full consequences, they could be serious. There’s something inherently sleazy about borrowing for the express purpose of funding politically convenient tax cuts. This is a $1.5 trillion bribe. Robert Samuelson is a columnist for The Washington Post. © 2017 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/childs-rep-tipton-do-you-remember-home/</link>
        <title>Childs: Rep. Tipton, do you remember home?</title>
        <description>The sun is just up here in Western Colorado, another brilliant blue sky day, which makes me think of you in Washington, far from the canyons, mesas and mountains where you grew up. It must feel choking sometimes, the press...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:33:43 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">60A717F6-CF86-168B-E053-0100007FD82D</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=DFF5C63E-1CAB-483A-995A-A779D6C9B3DD&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=DFF5C63E-1CAB-483A-995A-A779D6C9B3DD&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The sun is just up here in Western Colorado, another brilliant blue sky day, which makes me think of you in Washington, far from the canyons, mesas and mountains where you grew up. It must feel choking sometimes, the press of traffic and marble mansions, when you’re used to vast Western horizons. It’s a big difference between here and there. Out here, we’re made by the sense of land. Think Mesa Verde, Sleeping Ute and the crags of the San Juans always at your back. We’re fortunate to have a wealth of public and protected lands. This means generations down the line, we will still have this sense of unencumbered land, a resource that is becoming rarer in the world than oil. You must worry sometimes, like I do, that the sprawl of our many industries might darken your home landscape. You must be torn by the demands of a loose-cannon administration, and the pressure to open wild places to extraction, when far more than GDP is at stake. I drive a car and fly in planes, not unlike you. I use resources that we pull from the ground, and know they have to come from somewhere. But not from everywhere. Some places are best set aside. There seems to be no end to our hunger. If we can’t protect these canyons, mesas and mountains now, we may never have them back in our hands. I’ve heard you say that the Antiquities Act is being abused when local perspectives are not incorporated in decisions like Bears Ears. Were you there when then-Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell listened to days of local comments in July’s sweltering summer heat? It must have struck you as odd that Ryan Zinke breezed through and listened to only carefully selected voices, doing exactly what you are decrying, donning a cowboy hat and hearing only what fits his plan, not hearing the majority that wants these monuments in place. He disregarded indigenous agreements, a historic alignment of tribes that would begin to heal the wound of land forcibly taken, treaties not honored. He did the same to the millions of comments that poured in with support for the established monument boundaries. Who was he listening to, I wonder? Based on the new and dramatically shrunken borders, I’d say it wasn’t the people. As you lean toward bills that would limit our ability to protect lands through the Antiquities Act or otherwise, I ask you to remember home. Think about what it means to stand on dusty ground, to feel what is over every horizon. D.C. must be consuming at times; easy to forget where you came from and what deeply, viscerally matters to the people of the West. Yes, jobs and family matter, but maybe more so is the place, the reason we stay. I admire anyone who can go into the fray like you and do the hard work, but don’t get lost out there. Remember where you came from, and all of us out here on this bluebird morning, glad for what we have. Craig Childs, author of Apocalyptic Planet, House of Rain, Finders Keepers and other books, is a writer and adventurer based in Norwood.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/sheek-christmas-spirit-is-found-year-round-in-cortez/</link>
        <title>Sheek: Christmas spirit is found year ‘round in Cortez</title>
        <description>Karen Sheek If you believe the old Christmas carol, this is “the most wonderful time of the year.” I believe that it is. I love all things Christmas – the lights, the music, the food, the hustle-bustle of the holiday...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:58:58 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6059E0A4-A873-263A-E053-0100007F92D2</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=660F5816-A485-4E3F-A82C-BA9ED0468658&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=660F5816-A485-4E3F-A82C-BA9ED0468658&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Karen Sheek If you believe the old Christmas carol, this is “the most wonderful time of the year.” I believe that it is. I love all things Christmas – the lights, the music, the food, the hustle-bustle of the holiday season and traditions passed down through families. Most of all, I love the promise that this season alone holds – that there is more good than evil in the world; that peace is possible, and that we are our brothers’ keeper. This is the essence of the holiday season, but I see this manifested everyday in our community. The spirit of Christmas is alive and well in Cortez. We are a small, rural community – our population just reached 9,000 – and by some measures, economically depressed. But I am amazed by the many ways we care for one another. Cortez has a large number of non-profits that provide a wide range of services to our community. Some of these are national in origin, such as Habitat for Humanity and United Way, but many have come about because members of our own community saw a need and stepped forward to fill it. Our local city government recognizes the valuable services that these organizations provide “that preserve or enrich the health, education, welfare and fitness of the community.” Every year the Cortez City Council budgets money to support community organizations who apply for competitive grants. This year 23 grants were awarded, totaling $31,035. Cortez has a homeless shelter because local citizens were appalled that anyone should die in our city due to exposure during the cold winter months. Folks came together and founded The Bridge Emergency Shelter. In the past two years alone, 340 different people have stayed at The Bridge each year. In addition to a warm bed and hot meal, The Bridge has also helped a number of clients get back on their feet; they are now working steadily and can afford permanent housing. The Bridge was awarded a Colorado Department of Local Affairs grant this fall that, along with private donations and fee waivers from the City, will enable them to begin construction on a permanent home sometime next year, demonstrating the power of a vision that will soon result in the fulfillment of a dream. Did you know that two churches in our community, St. Barnabas Episcopal Church (through Grace’s Kitchen) and the United Methodist Church (through Hope’s Kitchen) coordinate to provide a hot meal five days a week and a sack lunch on Saturdays to anyone who shows up for lunch? They will have served over 32,000 meals by year’s end, filling bellies while they also work to enrich souls! Our small community supports a Community Thanksgiving Dinner and plans are underway for the Annual Community Christmas Dinner. Everyone is invited to these events, and they are another example of the way we exhibit our care for one another – no one should be alone or go hungry during the holidays. A local Christmas tradition began several years ago with the Mancos Valley Choir’s Christmas concerts. They gave six this year. Having another commitment when they sang at Montezuma-Cortez High School, I attended the Saturday afternoon concert in Mancos. As always, it was a wonderful event and a real gift to those in the audience. The final number in this year’s concert was “Let There Be Peace on Earth.” If this song is not familiar, check it out on YouTube. It sums up the holiday season perfectly: “Let there peace on earth, and let it begin with me.” We each have the opportunity to make a difference, if not on the world stage, then in our little corner of the world. Ghandi said, “Be the change you want to see in the world.” What better time to begin that change than during the present holiday season? Karen Sheek is the mayor of Cortez, a position elected by Cortez City Council members. Reach her at ksheek@cityofcortez.com or during her office hours from 12:30 - 1:30 p.m. the second and fourth Tuesday of the month.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/another-swing-of-the-boom-bust-cycle-is-underway/</link>
        <title>Another swing of the boom-bust cycle is underway</title>
        <description>du1-i-syn WASHINGTON – We don’t necessarily need an economic boom, but that’s what we may be getting. Since the 2016 election, the stock market is up roughly 24 percent, reports Wilshire Associates. The price of the cybercurrency bitcoin soared more...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:03:32 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">5FC9FED5-E7E8-6C91-E053-0100007FAAAA</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=6B428919-9FB4-436C-AC8A-973D47455E23&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=6B428919-9FB4-436C-AC8A-973D47455E23&#038;function=thumbnail&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;width=600&#038;height=400" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[du1-i-syn WASHINGTON – We don’t necessarily need an economic boom, but that’s what we may be getting. Since the 2016 election, the stock market is up roughly 24 percent, reports Wilshire Associates. The price of the cybercurrency bitcoin soared more than 1,000 percent before retreating. The unemployment rate of 4.1 percent is the lowest since 2000. The economy’s growth has exceeded 3 percent for the past two quarters. Anyone familiar with the post-World War II economy is bound to feel ambivalent about these dazzling developments. On the one hand, after so many years of disappointment following the Great Recession of 2007-09, it’s nice to see the economy outperforming. Since the low point in late 2009, non-farm jobs have increased by 17 million. On the other hand, extended booms give rise to long busts that have been hugely destructive in human terms – meaning higher unemployment and lower incomes. Since World War II, there have been two instances of these grand boom-bust cycles. The 106-month expansion in the 1960s was followed by more than a decade of economic turmoil: double-digit inflation, four recessions (unemployment peaked at 10.8 percent in late 1982) and a stagnant stock market corrected for inflation. The more recent and second grand cycle started with the tech boom of the 1990s that lasted exactly a decade. It led to the economic carnage of the 2008 financial crisis and Great Recession, still a recent memory in most of our minds. The ultimate source of these boom-bust episodes is human nature. Although prosperity is a good thing, long stretches of good times can become self-destructive. People – consumers, business owners and managers, bankers, investors, entrepreneurs – become sloppy, over-confident and complacent. They become increasingly vulnerable to economic setbacks, but their careless behavior continues because it is crowd-driven. This history cautions prudence. We don’t know whether the economic recovery that began in mid-2009 will end in some sort of crack-up. But we should minimize the odds of this happening by avoiding policies that over-stimulate the economy when it doesn’t need more “stimulus.” In the present context, there are two implications. First, the Federal Reserve should continue raising short-term interest rates, which are still low. And second, the Republican tax bill that just passed the Senate should not be allowed to increase budget deficits by a penny. The bill is estimated to add from $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion to deficits over a decade, depending on how the calculations are done. Lowering tax rates is good; borrowing to do so, as opposed to closing other tax breaks, is bad. What’s often overlooked is that even before the Republican tax proposals, projected budget deficits were sizable. The Congressional Budget Office estimates them at $10 trillion cumulatively from fiscal 2018 to 2027. Many mainstream economists have convinced themselves that the tax reforms won’t stimulate the economy or threaten the recovery. Here’s the conclusion of a study from Moody’s Analytics: “Neither the House or Senate [tax] plans would meaningfully improve economic growth. ... Growth would be stronger initially, since the deficit-financed tax cuts are a fiscal stimulus. But given that the economy is operating at full employment, stronger inflation and higher interest rates will result. The economic benefit of the lower tax rates on business investment is washed out by the higher interest rates.” Maybe. But in practice, this view may be too sanguine. Suppose the strong demand of a boom economy causes inflation to exceed expectations – say 4 percent instead of 2 percent. The increase could set off a destructive chain reaction. Higher inflation begets higher interest rates. (The Fed raises short-term rates; market pressures push up long-term rates on bonds and mortgages.) Higher interest rates darken the economic outlook, causing stocks to crash and confidence to slump. The truth is that we don’t fully understand the effects of budget deficits on the business cycle. On the other hand, we better understand history, and history suggests that the bigger the boom, the bigger the subsequent bust. A patient economy may ultimately be more rewarding and sustainable than its more spectacular counterpart. Robert Samuelson is a columnist for The Washington Post. © 2017 The Washington Post Writers Group]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
