<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    <title>View from the Boondocks</title>
    <category>View from the Boondocks</category>
    <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/section/columnists-view-from-the-boondocks/feed/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://tj.durangoherald.com/section/columnists-view-from-the-boondocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Latest local news from The Durango Herald.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 21:08:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/holiday-tree-provides-light-and-cheer-in-dark-days/</link>
        <title>Holiday tree provides light and cheer in dark days</title>
        <description>I got my Yule trees put up this past weekend, and mostly decorated. Our colleagues at the Durango Herald had an article last week on the comparative merits of real trees versus fake trees. I went to a fake tree...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:54:53 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">49CFC239-99E1-4B7E-AAC0-81C99CFFD2CB</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[I got my Yule trees put up this past weekend, and mostly decorated. Our colleagues at the Durango Herald had an article last week on the comparative merits of real trees versus fake trees. I went to a fake tree the year my son left for college, because it's really hard for one person to stand up and secure a real tree. So I got a small fake tree, maybe 30 inches tall plus the base. I got rid of all the old decorations, some of which were quite old with sentimental value, and got new ones the right size for the little tree. But after three or four years, I was missing a full-size tree, and they had them on sale at Lewis Merc. I bought one. It came in a box big enough to serve as a coffin for a small adult. No doubt an employee got it in the car for me, but I had to get it into the house. I've suppressed that memory. Then I had to assemble the tree. That was a major pain in the butt, getting the three trunk sections stuck together and the lights with each section plugged together. So I don't take the tree apart once the season is done. With a tow rope around the base, I drag the entire standing tree into my storage room for its 11-month rest. Each year on the second weekend of December I drag it back out to the living room. That happened Sunday. I carried the little tree out on Saturday and got it mostly decorated. Back when I bought the big tree, I thought about taking the little one to the thrift store, but now it provides cheer in the other downstairs room. Like the big tree, it came pre-lit with pre-LED lights. Last year I had a package of multi-color LED lights I bought the previous year when they were on sale. I put those on the small tree last year and use those instead of the old lights. Maybe eventually I'll do that with the big tree. The big tree is a mutant conifer with at least three types of branches all together - long needle, medium, and short needle. It's a tree never seen in nature, but it looks nice. I have to use a ladder to start the red Mardi Gras bead garland at the top and to put the upper-most ornaments on. The bottom ornaments must be unbreakable, because I have cats. Once it's fully decorated (meaning I can't find any more places to hang ornaments), the tree is glorious. On occasion, I move ornaments around for better effect, or if I spot any remaining open space. As the light faded Sunday afternoon, I plugged in the lights and was reminded once again of how much I enjoy these trees, the light and cheer they provide through the darkest days of the year. I hope yours does the same.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/its-our-river-too-that-was-desecrated/</link>
        <title>It’s ‘our’ river too that was desecrated</title>
        <description>We’re all downstream or downwind from something. That became all too visible last week as what’s now listed as 3 million gallons of orange toxic waste from a long-abandoned gold mine above Silverton made its way down the beautiful Animas...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:24:07 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">E52D9A53-0BDC-490F-B126-EC215ADA0A13</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[We're all downstream or downwind from something. That became all too visible last week as what's now listed as 3 million gallons of orange toxic waste from a long-abandoned gold mine above Silverton made its way down the beautiful Animas River, through Durango, and into New Mexico. We too often take our rivers and clean water for granted until something like this happens. I saw a lot of people angry and grieving as they waited for the mine sludge to reach Durango, and as it passed through. People stood on bridges or along the shore watching the water. Durango water customers were asked to cut their water use. Bottled water disappeared off store shelves. One doesn't have to live in or near Durango to feel that this is "our" river that was desecrated. Friends did healing rituals for the river. It was encouraging that the water looked a lot better on Sunday and continues to get better. It remains to be seen what the long-term effects will be on fish and on the small creatures at the bottom of the food chain that the fish depend on. Are you letting that water into your irrigation ditch yet? Who will make up the income for local river rafting companies and their employees? The situation has drawn national news coverage and the attention of people in high places, like our governor, our two U.S. Senators, and the head of the Environmental Protection Agency which is credited with causing the huge spill. So far, none of them has waved a magic wand and made everything right. All the king's horses and all the king's men couldn't put Humpty together again. Some people are wondering if the EPA will impose a monster fine on itself, like it would if anyone else caused this. Many locals don't like the EPA. But orange toxic water is our legacy from the good old days when there were no evil guv'mint regulations to interfere with profit maximization. One good thing that can come from this is a general public awareness of the toxic water that flows out of a lot of old abandoned mines in Colorado and other places with a mining history. You can block up the mine portal to stop it, but the water accumulates until it comes out someplace else. As of early this week, there were still 550 gallons per minute of toxic water coming out of the Gold King mine. Last week's spill was just a lot more visible than the usual toxic flows. Back East, rivers have been contaminated by coal ash from power plants and other toxins. Those spills reflected shoddy maintenance of facilities intended to control toxins. But hey, maintenance is expensive and reduces profits. Maybe it's time to consider what's more valuable in the larger scheme of things. Gold? Oil and gas? Short-term profit maximization? Or good clean water?]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/tabor-squeezing-colorado-recovery/</link>
        <title>TABOR squeezing Colorado recovery</title>
        <description>This might be the year for Colorado taxpayers to take a serious look at the TABOR (Taxpayers’ Bill of Rights) Amendment that voters put into the state constitution in 1992. Along with providing steady work for tax attorneys in Colorado,...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 21:26:13 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">764084EE-749E-4A27-A862-EB46F3D912D5</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[This might be the year for Colorado taxpayers to take a serious look at the TABOR (Taxpayers' Bill of Rights) Amendment that voters put into the state constitution in 1992. Along with providing steady work for tax attorneys in Colorado, it dictates that ANY tax increase by any level of government must be approved by voters. I haven't heard anyone propose to change that. But TABOR contains a lot more. So much so that in the mid 1990s, state voters approved another constitutional amendment limiting state ballot issues to a single subject. Unfortunately, I've seen several ballot issues in the past few years that made a total mockery of that. The issue looming now is TABOR's "ratchet down" effect. State finances were hit hard in the Great Recession. Public schools had to deal with take-backs of a cumulative $1 billion in state equalization funding. School districts are now trying to get that money, but TABOR might prevent it. State highways, always short on funding, had prospects of a $200 million infusion this year with the improving state economy and state revenues. But not with TABOR. Water supply is always hot issue in Colorado. Locals want Front Range municipal water interests to fully develop their water storage before they try to take more West Slope water or buy rights from East Slope farmers and ranchers. One source of funding for water projects is state severance taxes. Because of pending TABOR refunds, Gov. Hickenlooper wants to divert severance tax money to back-fill those refunds in other parts of the budget. It's all connected. And you know all that new revenue from recreational marijuana businesses, that's supposed to pay for state oversight of those businesses and for school construction? Nope. That's "excess," it seems, and will have to be refunded. Each taxpayer will get a refund big enough for a nice meal at McDonalds. That's because the increase in state revenues will likely trigger TABOR's ratchet down effect this year. TABOR dictates that if a government's revenue increases by more than a certain amount each year, the money above that limit is "excess" and must be returned to taxpayers somehow. This is not "surplus" money, which implies money left over after all valid needs are met. TABOR includes a provision that allows voters to approve an exemption to this, commonly known as "deBrucing" after TABOR author Douglas Bruce. Voters have done this for most local government entities, but getting statewide approval to deBruce the state government seems to be a lot harder. The result of the ratchet-down effect is that state finances will never recover from the recession, because the revenue limits ratchet down to the low point. Some people have called this an unintended consequence of TABOR. From what I know of Doug Bruce, it was totally intended. His other assorted ballot schemes, wisely rejected by voters in the 1990s and early 2000s, showed intent to bankrupt and make all levels of government unable to function. State legislators have already said they won't initiate a statewide deBrucing effort or amendment to address the ratchet-down issue. It will have to come from we the taxpayers. Stay tuned. Good roads, good schools and the like aren't paid for by the Tooth Fairy.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/get-those-ballots-in/</link>
        <title>Get those ballots in</title>
        <description>Ballots for the Nov. 4 local, state, and national elections were mailed to registered voters last week. They need to be returned to the county clerk by 7 p.m. on Nov. 4 to be counted. Postmarks don’t count. Contact the...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:15:59 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6E0C8E80-2DBD-4E9B-AF0F-8BE5FAE68F8E</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Ballots for the Nov. 4 local, state, and national elections were mailed to registered voters last week. They need to be returned to the county clerk by 7 p.m. on Nov. 4 to be counted. Postmarks don't count. Contact the county clerk's office if you haven't received a ballot in the mail - for La Plata County call 382-6296; for Archuleta County call 264-8350. Read and follow all the directions with the ballot. Each ballot must be returned in the envelope that came with it, not the envelope that came with the ballot for another member of the household. Ballots can be mailed back; allow plenty of time for delivery. Or they can be inserted in 24-hour drop boxes at Bayfield Town Hall or the La Pata County Clerk's Office at 98 Everett St. south of the Centennial Shopping Center in Durango. There are lots of other options and times for La Plata County voters to turn in ballots, including Saturdays: Voter service and polling centers . Bayfield Town Hall and the La Plata County Clerk's Office in Durango - Monday through Friday this week and next, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Saturday, Oct. 25 and Nov. 1 from 8 a.m. to noon; and election day from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. . La Plata County Fairgrounds on Saturday, Nov. 1, from 8 a.m. to noon, Monday, Nov. 3, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., and election day from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Ballot drop-off locations in addition to the 24 hour boxes: . Ignacio Town Hall on Saturday, Nov. 1, 8 a.m. to noon; Monday, Nov. 3, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.; election day, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. . County Courthouse weekdays from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; Saturday, Nov. 1, from 8 a.m. to noon; Monday, Nov. 3 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.; election day, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. To check your voter registration, go on-line to www.govotecolorado.com. To register to vote or to update your address if you have moved, go to www.govotecolorado.com; or download an application from www.laplatacountyclerk.org and mail it back to 98 Everett St., suite C, Durango CO 81303; or register in person at the clerk's office or the county annex in Bayfield Town Hall. The county clerk's office has a long list of documents voters can use as their identification to vote, including valid Colorado drivers license or ID card issued by the Colorado Department of Revenue; valid U.S. passport; valid federal, state or local government employee photo ID; FAA pilot's license; military or veteran's photo ID; Medicare or Medicaid card; student photo ID from a Colorado institution; and tribal member ID cards. Contact the clerk's office for the full list or any other questions.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/some-of-us-dont-have-a-vote-in-lpea-board-election/</link>
        <title>Some of us don’t have a vote in LPEA board election</title>
        <description>The annual LPEA board election is happening now, at least for some co-op members. Letters to the editor have become rather heated, especially regarding incumbent nine-year board member Jeff Berman. Some critics say that’s too long. Never mind that it...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:43:43 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C079A420-FD97-4F90-B976-5DB17D5B5F43</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The annual LPEA board election is happening now, at least for some co-op members. Letters to the editor have become rather heated, especially regarding incumbent nine-year board member Jeff Berman. Some critics say that's too long. Never mind that it wasn't that long ago when we had good ol' boys on the board for 50 years. I think it's good that those days are in the past. But the generation, transmission, and financial aspects of providing electric are too complicated for short-termers. Term limits in the state legislature have given the institutional memory to special interest lobbyists. There needs to be a balance. Some critics apparently want to keep us dependent on coal-fired power generation no matter what it's doing to our future. Do those critics have grandchildren? Everyone wants cheap electricity. But as I mentioned last month, coal-fired power has major costs that are foisted off on third parties and aren't part of the cost paid by the customer. My electric bill went up a bunch when LPEA raised its base rate, because my monthly electric use is very low (and I'm proud of that). I was advised by a person in a position to know that the base rate is supposed to cover the cost of maintaining LPEA's distribution system, and that if that cost was really being covered, the base rate would be more than $30. Note that LPEA also was whacked with a significant price increase from its power supplier, Tri-State. This year, LPEA raised its rates for actual electric use. My bill didn't go up as much as it did with the base rate increase. I have no sympathy for those who assert their gawd-given right as Americans to cling to old style incandescent light bulbs. LPEA has challenged some aspects of Tri-State's rate increase, including contractual limits on how much local renewable power LPEA can generate. I am all for more local renewable generation. I'll support those board candidates. My big beef now is that for the second year in a row, customers in what I think is LPEA's largest district in La Plata County don't get to vote at all. That's the area south of Highway 160 and the southwest part of the county. This isn't a commentary for or against the current board members from our district, at least one of whom, I'm pretty sure, has been on the board longer than Jeff Berman. LPEA directors are chosen by district. Only people living in a district get to vote on that district's candidates. I'm thinking some of the people who have been so critical of Berman have supported a similar voting-by-district system for the county commissioners. I'd suggest going the other way, to elect LPEA directors at large (but living in their districts) like the county commissioners. That way, some of Berman's biggest critics could actually vote against him.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/stop-the-war-on-future-generations/</link>
        <title>Stop the war on future generations</title>
        <description>Tuesday was Earth Day. For some of us, that’s an occasion to recognize that the Earth is the only global life support system we’ve got, and we should treat her accordingly. For others, the Earth is to be plundered for...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 23:03:28 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">77DC5F66-D480-40ED-8D05-5B0BB306F13D</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Tuesday was Earth Day. For some of us, that's an occasion to recognize that the Earth is the only global life support system we've got, and we should treat her accordingly. For others, the Earth is to be plundered for short-term profit maximization, and the ecological consequences are something the grand-kids can deal with. For those of us who don't live in caves, the ecological consequences are already quite obvious in the ever-more erratic and extreme weather. They are in the news daily. They are showing up in higher beef prices, and extreme drought is slashing fruit and vegetable production in California. The Midwestern breadbasket has alternated between crop shriveling drought and fields too wet to plant. Recognizing these trends, there's been a lot of interest in expanding local food production as a form of homeland security. But last week, the Durango Herald reported some locals are finding their soil has been made toxic to garden plants by long-lasting herbicides used on pastures. They used manure, or compost that included manure, from cows or horses that fed on these pastures. Now it's in their soil. In economic jargon, this is called an "externality." A company makes money producing the product, and the user presumably benefits as well. The negative consequences handily fall on others. American capitalism doesn't address that. In fact, the above-mentioned short-term profit maximization dictates against addressing it without government intervention. We see this with water, an absolute essential for life. There might not be water for food production, but there's water for fracking oil and gas wells. Several hundred thousand people in West Virginia found their tap water unusable back in January because of a chemical spill into the river. Better maintenance of the chemical storage facility would have cut into short-term profits. My understanding is that West Virginia is well known for its lax regulatory enforcement. The chemical in question is used to clean coal. Then there was the pipe that broke under a Duke Energy coal sludge pile in North Carolina that washed toxic sludge into another river, turning the water gray. Yum! This one apparently affects mainly farmers whose cows drink this water. These coal ash storage ponds exist in many places, a by-product of coal-fired power generation. According to National Public Radio, North Carolina officials have found high levels of toxic metals in groundwater around ash storage ponds since 2010. So a spill isn't even necessary to create toxic consequences. But regulators there apparently are very cozy with the industries they regulate. We see the same externality with people dealing with health effects of air pollution, such as from coal-fired power plants. Mercury pollution in lakes also has been attributed to coal-fired power plants. Don't eat the predator fish. Coal-fired power plants also are major sources of the greenhouse gasses that a vast majority of climate scientists say are causing global climate change. But there are some very wealthy people whose interest is to keep Americans dependent on coal and other fossil fuels. So we are told there is a "war on coal." Actually, I see it as a war on future generations, again for short-term profit maximization. But there was some good news last week. Astronomers have identified a rocky planet that could able to support life, given its size and the distance from its sun. The bad news is it's 500 light years away.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/congressional-votes-emphasize-their-partys-priorities/</link>
        <title>Congressional votes emphasize their party’s priorities</title>
        <description>Our worthies in congress are on yet another of their taxpayer-funded vacations. Before they left town, they busied themselves voting on political statements that have zero chance of becoming law. Senate Democrats tried to raise the minimum wage. A large...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 21:55:33 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">62C7FBA4-BB4E-4312-A976-6A56DA41C1DC</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Our worthies in congress are on yet another of their taxpayer-funded vacations. Before they left town, they busied themselves voting on political statements that have zero chance of becoming law. Senate Democrats tried to raise the minimum wage. A large share of low-wage jobs are held by women. Republicans blocked that. Senate Democrats tried to make it easier for women to get equal pay for equal work. Republicans blocked that too. To be fair, Republicans have cleverly pointed out that their Democratic colleagues and the White House need to do some work themselves for their own female employees. In the Republican-controlled House, Republicans voted yet again (with 12 Republican dissenters) for Rep. Paul Ryan's budget plan that would cut taxes for the rich, give more money to the Pentagon, and stick it to working class Americans. Ryan has proposed repeatedly to gut funding for programs that assist struggling Americans, like Food Stamps and Medicaid (a large share of which pays for low income seniors in nursing homes). The latest Ryan budget plan also includes cuts to low-income heating assistance, highway construction (jobs), and Pell grants to help low-income students go to college. House Republicans have voted somewhere around 50 times to repeal Obamacare. Ryan's latest budget also would do that. So those of you with pre-existing conditions can go back to being uninsured. Seniors with Medicare Part D who depend on very expensive drugs can once again pay 100 percent of that cost, instead of just under 50 percent as dictated by Obamacare, when you are in the Part D "donut hole." Republicans have told us over and over how Obamacare cuts funding for Medicare. Obamacare reduces the government subsidy for Medicare Advantage plans, which, as best I can tell, aren't even available in our area. So big deal. But funny thing. The Ryan plan preserves those very same cuts. Ryan's budget plan has repeatedly been to turn Medicare itself into a voucher program for future seniors, so they can buy private insurance (like Obamacare?). If you think private for-profit insurance companies are going to want to sign up a bunch of old people with expensive chronic health problems, I need to talk to you about helping me get a multi-million dollar inheritance out of Nigeria. But I digress. House Republicans know this scheme will never become law... unless, of course they manage to take control of the U.S. Senate this fall. Colorado is one of the states in play there (watch the out-of-state fat cat money pouring in). Last weekend, Republican presidential wannabees were among those attending a conference in New Hampshire for conservative activists, sponsored by Americans for Prosperity, the "grassroots" front group for the multi-billionaire Koch brothers. Interestingly, some of the wannabees (Rand Paul, Canadian-born Ted Cruz, and Donald Trump) disavowed the Ryan budget plan. The AP quotes Trump as saying, "Leave my Medicare alone." Somehow I don't think he actually needs Medicare, but I appreciate the sentiment.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/supreme-court-moves-u-s-toward-oligarchy/</link>
        <title>Supreme Court moves U.S. toward oligarchy</title>
        <description>The pro-corporate majority on the U.S. Supreme Court took steps last week to move the U.S. still farther toward government of, by, and for the fat cats and big corporations (as if we aren’t already there). They tossed out overall...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:31:08 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">ECA8A588-8F9C-40D2-9500-5AB5AE7D5DFD</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The pro-corporate majority on the U.S. Supreme Court took steps last week to move the U.S. still farther toward government of, by, and for the fat cats and big corporations (as if we aren't already there). They tossed out overall limits on how much rich individuals can contribute to political candidates, political parties, and campaign groups. Cumulative six- and seven-figure campaign donations are First Amendment free speech and can't be abridged, they said. According to National Public Radio and Associated Press, 646 donors (out of around 120 million voters) hit the cumulative limit in the 2011-12 election cycle. So those One Percenters are the ones whose free speech rights can now soar. This ruling follows the court's 2010 Citizens United ruling tossing out limits on corporate and union donations, also in the guise of free speech, affirming constitutional rights for corporate entities that owe no allegiance to this country and that aren't burdened with any responsibilities of good citizenship. The court has in effect monetized free speech. So guess whose free speech counts in the political world? The Supreme Court has dictated that we will have the best elected representatives that out-of-state fat cat money can buy. Last week's ruling doesn't affect donations to independent 501-C-4 "social welfare" groups that flood the airwaves with those sleazy half-truth (at best) campaign ads. According to the same NPR/AP stories as above, the same 646 fat cats donated around $93.4 million to these independent groups in the last campaign. I'm thinking last week's ruling also seems to make very fuzzy the line between free speech and bribery. If I offer a bribe, I'm expressing myself, right? Correspondingly, is it free speech for someone in government to ask for a bribe? Oh, right. It's just that the worthies have a lot of demands on their time, and they can't see everyone. And they have to raise boatloads of special interest money for their re-election campaigns, since Americans won't support publicly-funded campaigns. So I'm sure you understand. Money already buys access in congress. You can be sure it's not buying access to promote the interests of working stiff Americans or the poor. So how long until the U.S. is like much of the rest of the world, where bribes are a way of doing business? I would argue this is totally incompatible with American-style democracy, or at least the idealized version that we celebrate on the Fourth of July. For quite a few years, a large majority of Americans have said the country is headed in the wrong direction. I'm one of them, and this is one of the reasons. But hey, the Supreme Court says it's okay.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/clothing-10-best-list-causes-puzzlement/</link>
        <title>Clothing 10 best list causes puzzlement</title>
        <description>It’s spring break time, so I’m taking the week off from political commentary. Gawd knows we need a break from politics! The magazine that comes with the Sunday newspaper had an item that I couldn’t pass up. It’s a list...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:20:49 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">DCAC93EA-E264-4C64-86C0-1887B18DD53A</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[It's spring break time, so I'm taking the week off from political commentary. Gawd knows we need a break from politics! The magazine that comes with the Sunday newspaper had an item that I couldn't pass up. It's a list of 10 best clothing items for your spring closet, as seen by TV personality Tim Gunn. I haven't had a TV for most of my adult life, so I know nothing about Mr. Gunn. But he looks very trim and stylish, sort of like a big city lawyer who just flew in for a court hearing (the local lawyers don't dress like that, even for court), or maybe an undertaker. So here's my take on his recommended clothing list: 1. Trenchcoat. Does Carhartt make trenchcoats? Maybe one of those cowboy-style dusters... 2. After 5 look. Gunn suggests the classic little black dress or a nice tuxedo pant with classic white top. No mention of which gender this is meant for, but these days it may not matter. My thought for locals is ditch the paint-spattered torn T-shirt and jeans from your day job and put on clean ones before a big evening out. 3. Day dress. Gunn refers to a classic designer wrap dress. I don't know what that is. 4. Blazer. Gunn suggests tweedy with an equestrian look for country chic, or schoolboy blazer with motorcycle boots for a rock 'n roll image. What can I say? Locals who are sporting an equestrian look often are wearing beat up cowboy boots complete with spurs, sometimes a cowboy hat that looks like it's been drug behind a pickup, or a greasy John Deere cap. 5. Denim. Now you're talking! Gunn advises that, "The most flattering fit will be a style that falls straight from the widest part of your hip with neither a flare nor a taper." Would that be what we call a cowboy cut? Are we talking about pants? 6. Footwear. He doesn't elaborate. Are we talking flip-flops? Cowboy boots? Hiking boots? The afore-mentioned biker boots? Combat boots to wear with that little black dress? Red patent leather over the knee boots with outlandishly high heels for that bad girl (or drag queen) look? 7. Signature jewelry. Gunn refers to classic pearls, a cocktail ring, or a sculptural cuff, whatever that is. Again, are we referring to a particular gender? Mardi Gras beads (left over from Snowdown) come in many styles and colors to fit any occasion or gender. 8. Under-arsenal. Gunn says the key word is "nude." Does that mean don't wear any? 9. Sweatsuit alternative. Gunn advises for anyplace other than the gym, a better choice is cashmere pants with a cardigan. Right. He also allows for dark wash jeans with a sweater or "breezy linen pants" (does that mean holes in strategic places?) and a T-shirt. I have sweat pants in enough colors to go with any of my tie-dye T-shirts. 10. Trendy self-indulgent item costing no more than $20. Actually I can rationalize more expensive baubles when many of my clothes are from the thrift store. Maybe I don't get out to the real world often enough. Do Mr. Gunn's suggestions reflect the way people dress there? For his sake, I hope Mr. Gunn doesn't come to La Plata County. He might have an apoplectic fit at what passes for style here.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
