<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
    <title>Editorials</title>
    <category>Editorials</category>
    <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/section/editorials-2/feed/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://tj.durangoherald.com/section/editorials-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Latest local news from The Durango Herald.</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:38:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-a-primary-of-extremes/</link>
        <title>Our view: A primary of extremes</title>
        <description>GOP governor&apos;s race too close to call; Denver ousts a 15-term incumbent</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">E9DBFA57-A2C9-42F5-BFC9-CF694FDCE1C7</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[GOP governor's race too close to call; Denver ousts a 15-term incumbentIt’s the extremes in Colorado’s primary results that are attracting attention both within the state and nationally, involving both parties.At this writing, the Republican race for governor has not been called. By the narrowest of margins – about 2,000 votes out of more than 515,000 cast, less than half a percentage point – Victor Marx, a ministry leader and former Marine, leads two-term state Sen. Barb Kirkmeyer, with state Rep. Scott Bottoms in third.Marx claimed that his lack of political experience was an asset and that there was no need to share his planned policies as governor before the primary. He cites his faith and describes himself as a humanitarian who, with his organizations, has aided people in this country and abroad, including in Iraq. Television personalities are enjoying his vague answers to whether he has ever killed anyone. Marx has said that, at age 7, his stepfather forced him to kill a man in Mississippi – a claim local law enforcement there has no record of.Marx raised $2.8 million, mostly small-dollar contributions from more than 21,000 donors, outraising Kirkmeyer ($629,544) and Bottoms ($259,341) combined, per filings through June 28. He carried Montezuma County by 4% over second-place Bottoms.Kirkmeyer, a five-term Weld County commissioner who between those stints served as acting director of the state Department of Local Affairs under Gov. Bill Owens, is currently a member of the influential state Joint Budget Committee. Weld County has grown and prospered through oil and natural gas extraction, agriculture and proximity to Denver, giving Kirkmeyer deep familiarity with significant issues.Should Marx’s lead hold, Republicans will have chosen a blank slate, perhaps with promise, over deeply experienced legislative and county government leadership. They may also have been thumbing their noses at establishment politics – after all, it’s far easier to rail against government than to actually govern.The Republican nominee will compete against Attorney General Phil Weiser, who campaigned aggressively across the state, including in its southwest corner, and cited his participation in 66 lawsuits against President Donald Trump’s actions. Weiser is best known for successfully matching local and regional leadership to effectively expend opioid settlement monies – more than $900 million secured from drug manufacturers and distributors.Ever present and engaged, Weiser defeated early favorite Sen. Michael Bennet by nearly 12 points. Among Montezuma County’s Democrats, his margin was 18%.In Montezuma County, incumbent 3rd Congressional District Rep. Jeff Hurd defeated Ron Hanks, 62-38, and Democrats voted 56-44 to continue John Hickenlooper as senator over state Sen. Julie Gonzales.In county races, Republicans chose Rodney Cox, a fifth-generation county resident and longtime business owner, to succeed term-limited District 1 Commissioner Jim Candelaria, giving him 55% of the vote. He faced Bonnie Anderson, who led the county’s weed abatement program, and Diane Fox-Spratlen, formerly with the Cortez Police Department; the three took part in forums that clarified differences over growth, services and a proposed 1% county sales tax. They also split on the proposed Dolores River National Conservation Area: Anderson opposed it, while Cox and Fox-Spratlen supported it as an alternative to a potential Wild and Scenic River designation.Cox faces Democrat Rebecca Busic, unopposed in her primary, in November.For county clerk and recorder, Jerri Frizzell, with 16 years in the office and a campaign message of experience and continuity, had an easy time of it, winning 70-30 over Lenetta Shull, a business owner and former county Republican Party leader who ran on modernization, voter outreach and improved customer service.As another extreme, 29-year-old former corporate lawyer Melat Kiros, a democratic socialist, defeated 15-term (!) Congresswoman Diana DeGette for the 1st Congressional District seat. Kiros campaigned on Medicare for All, abolishing ICE and aiding working people. She is also known for questioning Israel’s right to its land on the eastern end of the Mediterranean. Little known initially, support for Kiros' campaign apparently surged with democratic socialist primary wins in New York State.The 1st Congressional District is Denver, not all of Colorado.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-america-at-250/</link>
        <title>Our view: America at 250</title>
        <description>Today’s politics test the Founders’ design</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">59A108AE-8C89-415B-905F-2C1B2BA40C80</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Today’s politics test the Founders’ designAmericans can struggle to grasp the reasoning behind the writings of the Founding Fathers after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which is celebrated this weekend. The debates about individual rights and the roles of state and national government in the Federalist Papers, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights can seem hazy in textbooks or lecture halls.No such trouble now, as President Donald Trump’s authoritarian decision-making, Congress’ silence and the mixed decisions by the Supreme Court are providing real-time examples of the nation’s extraordinary foundations. The actions and inactions should be fodder for debates in classrooms and on street corners, a reminder of the strengths of the American experiment that we believe the country will eventually return to.This week, the Supreme Court affirmed birthright citizenship, which Trump had hoped would end and reduce immigration numbers. Added to the Constitution originally to provide for those who had been enslaved and their offspring, it will continue. Days earlier, the court said “yes” to the president’s ability to remove independent federal agency members without cause if their participation wasn’t in line with the direction he was taking the country (the exception was members of the Federal Reserve, as the court clarified in a case involving Lisa Cook). Those members had been confirmed by the Senate and could only be removed for neglect of duty or malfeasance. The “unitary theory of the executive” in the Constitution was the court’s justification.Previous presidents have taken the country to war without much consultation with Congress, as the Constitution requires, but using the U.S. military to obliterate the occupants of a couple dozen fast boats at sea ostensibly transporting drugs without consultation or reporting is a new extreme. That’s murder, some critics say.Of greater significance is the president’s desire to replace states’ control of national elections with the federal government, despite no demonstrated need to change the current system. Gone would be mail-in balloting and the receipt of any ballots after Election Day, and the voter would have to appear on the national OK-to-vote list. The Supreme Court also ruled that states may count late-arriving postal ballots if they were postmarked by Election Day, rejecting the administration’s push to block the practice. It’s not hard to believe the president wants only his supporters to be able to vote.Then there’s the question of personal enrichment. This president’s overseas initiatives include components that enrich his family members. A share of mineral extraction, capital for a crypto company, the green light for a resort development – all in exchange for U.S. support and funding. Threatening to link weapons support for Ukraine to tarring a Joe Biden family member, for which Trump was impeached by the House, seems so long ago; we soon learned it was only the beginning.What do the founding documents say about preventing the president from enriching himself? Read the Domestic Emoluments Clause and the Foreign Emoluments Clause. Was it expected subsequent presidents would be as restrained as George Washington?And how can Congress, both houses, repeatedly acquiesce to the president’s lead in so many areas? He has refused to spend money that Congress has authorized and is spending money that it hasn’t. There has been little mention of the country’s debt, now approaching $40 trillion – about $3.2 trillion higher than when Trump took office – and funding is at the core of Congress’ responsibilities. One of the three branches of government is not exercising its constitutional role.Habeas corpus is a defendant’s right to hear from a judge what they are accused of. Seizing someone off the street because of their skin color or the language they’re speaking and then holding them without notice is illegal and not supposed to happen. The Constitution, again.The list could go on. Some of what is taking place now may endure in practice, but the country’s foundations of individual rights, an engaged Congress and an independent, honest judiciary remain strong enough to withstand it. What is taking place now is an example of what this country is not. Debate these issues to better understand what the Founding Fathers included in their work.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-your-primary-election-primer/</link>
        <title>Our view: Your primary election primer</title>
        <description>Ballots are due June 30, and the decisions voters make in the primary will shape the choices available in November. Primary elections determine who appears on the general election ballot, and in Colorado, unaffiliated voters play an increasingly influential role...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">E3BEA6D9-0C13-479C-BA1C-2882E3B3082C</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Ballots are due June 30, and the decisions voters make in the primary will shape the choices available in November.Primary elections determine who appears on the general election ballot, and in Colorado, unaffiliated voters play an increasingly influential role in those decisions. More than half Colorado voters are registered unaffiliated and may participate in either party's primary.Yet participation remains low. As of June 22, 1,476 ballots had been returned in Montezuma County, representing about 7.3% of the county's 20,169 active registered voters. In 2024, only about 26% of Colorado voters participated in the primary election. Despite helping determine who appears on the November ballot, primary elections continue to draw far fewer voters than general elections.Over the past several weeks, the Journal Editorial Board interviewed candidates, published guest columns and developed recommendations based on their qualifications, experience and approaches to governing. Here is a summary of those recommendations.United States SenateDemocratic Primary: John Hickenlooper over Julie Gonzales.Gonzales has built an impressive legislative record and represents a rising generation of Colorado leadership. Hickenlooper, however, brings experience as a former Denver mayor, governor and U.S. senator. His record on public lands, water policy, tribal partnerships and bipartisan problem-solving made him the stronger choice.Republican Primary: Mark Baisley is unopposed.Representative to the 120th U.S. Congress – District 3Democratic Primary: Dwayne Romero over Alex Kelloff.Both candidates focused on issues important to rural Colorado, including affordability, healthcare, water and economic development. Romero’s experience in state government, local elected office, business and military service gives him a stronger foundation for representing the diverse needs of rural Colorado and serving effectively in Congress.Republican Primary: Jeff Hurd over Ron Hanks.While we encouraged Hurd to continue demonstrating independence on issues such as public lands and voter participation, we concluded he offers a broader and more inclusive vision than Hanks, whose campaign has been closely aligned with efforts to restrict participation by unaffiliated voters in Colorado's primary elections.GovernorDemocratic Primary: Phil Weiser over Michael Bennet.Both candidates are accomplished public servants. Bennet's record in the U.S. Senate is substantial, but Weiser's eight years as attorney general, his relationships across all 64 counties and deep familiarity with Colorado government gave him the edge.Republican Primary: Barbara Kirkmeyer over Scott Bottoms and Victor Marx.Kirkmeyer distinguished herself through decades of governing experience, including more than 20 years as a Weld County commissioner and service in the state Senate. While Bottoms and Marx offered sharply different visions, Kirkmeyer demonstrated the strongest record of public administration, bipartisan problem-solving and practical governance. As we noted, running government is different from campaigning against it.Secretary of StateDemocratic Primary: Jessie Danielson over Amanda Gonzalez.Both candidates are well qualified and have strong records defending Colorado’s election system. Danielson’s rural roots, legislative experience and leadership on voting access issues gave her a slight advantage.Republican Primary: James Wiley is unopposed.Attorney GeneralDemocratic Primary: Michael Dougherty over Jena Griswold, David Seligman and Hetal Doshi.Dougherty’s nearly three decades as a prosecutor, service as deputy attorney general and leadership in some of Colorado’s most significant criminal cases make him uniquely qualified for the state’s top legal position.Republican Primary: Michael Allen over David Wilson.Both bring military and legal experience, but Allen’s leadership as district attorney for El Paso and Teller counties and his record managing major criminal prosecutions made him the stronger choice.Primary elections offer voters something increasingly rare in modern politics: an opportunity to compare candidates who often share broad values but differ significantly in experience, priorities and governing philosophies.The choices made on June 30 will shape Colorado’s choices in November. Whether you are a Democrat, Republican or one of the many unaffiliated voters who now help decide primary outcomes, the most important step is simple: participate.The future of Colorado is not shaped only in November. It is being shaped right now.Editor’s note: Journal editorials reflect the views of the Editorial Board, independent of news reporting. Opinion content – including editorials, columns and letters to the editor – is intended to encourage thoughtful discussion of public issues and candidates. While opinions may differ, the Journal strives to ensure that all content is grounded in facts, context and informed analysis.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-primary-choices-attorney-general-and-secretary-of-state/</link>
        <title>Our view: Primary choices – attorney general and secretary of state</title>
        <description>Attorney General – Democratic Party Primary Jena Griswold is an attorney serving her second term as Colorado secretary of state after winning election in 2018. As secretary of state, she expanded voter access, increased ballot drop boxes, implemented automatic voter...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">45015A15-0604-427F-BBBB-839736F22A64</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Attorney General – Democratic Party PrimaryJena Griswold is an attorney serving her second term as Colorado secretary of state after winning election in 2018. As secretary of state, she expanded voter access, increased ballot drop boxes, implemented automatic voter registration, and championed laws protecting election workers and voting equipment. Her campaign centers on defending democracy, protecting civil rights and protecting Colorado from actions by the Trump administration.David Seligman is a consumer-rights, labor-rights and antitrust attorney who serves as executive director of Towards Justice. A Harvard Law School graduate, he has built his campaign around workers’ rights, consumer protection and corporate accountability.Hetal Doshi is a former federal prosecutor and deputy assistant attorney general at the U.S. Department of Justice. She helped lead antitrust cases against Google, Apple and Ticketmaster and has emphasized consumer protection and voting rights.Michael Dougherty has spent nearly three decades as a prosecutor and serves as Boulder County district attorney. He previously served as Colorado’s deputy attorney general, supervising units responsible for public corruption, election-related crimes, environmental crimes and financial fraud.Dougherty led the prosecution of the King Soopers mass shooter and played a pivotal role in securing justice in the Mark Redwine murder case, helping secure Redwine’s conviction more than a decade after his 13-year-old son, Dylan, disappeared from Vallecito. He has earned endorsements from Democratic and Republican prosecutors, sheriffs and law-enforcement leaders across Colorado.All four Democrats bring strengths to the race. But the attorney general’s office demands courtroom experience, management ability and legal judgment. Dougherty’s nearly 30 years as a prosecutor, service as deputy attorney general and record in some of Colorado’s most significant criminal cases make him uniquely qualified for the job. Advancing Dougherty to November would give Democrats their strongest candidate and Colorado a proven legal leader.Attorney General – Republican Party PrimaryMichael Allen is the district attorney for El Paso and Teller counties, where he is serving a second term. A Navy veteran, Allen points to his role in creating an organized crime unit and the state’s first vehicle theft task force. He is best known for prosecuting the Club Q mass shooting case. Allen argues that local governments should not dictate national energy policy and has criticized Boulder County’s climate-related lawsuit against energy companies.David Wilson spent 20 years in the U.S. Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Corps as both a prosecutor and defense attorney. He later advised the National Security Agency and now consults on cybersecurity and fraud issues. He recently participated in efforts to exclude unaffiliated voters from Colorado primaries and has been a vocal supporter of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, saying, “What happened to Tina Peters is disgusting.” He has criticized Attorney General Phil Weiser’s lawsuits against the Trump administration, and faulted Democrats for funding medical care for undocumented immigrants and pursuing policies he believes threaten TABOR.Both candidates bring legal credentials and military service to the race. Allen, however, has demonstrated success leading a major prosecutorial office and handling some of Colorado’s most consequential criminal cases. Republicans would be better served advancing Allen.Secretary of State – Democratic Party PrimaryAmanda Gonzalez is Jefferson County’s clerk and recorder, overseeing elections for more than half a million residents. She previously served as executive director of Colorado Common Cause.Jessie Danielson served two terms in the Colorado House and is completing her second term in the Senate. Raised on a Weld County farm, she has been a leading voice in expanding voting access and strengthening Colorado’s election system.Both candidates have defended Colorado’s election process, opposed federal efforts to obtain confidential voter information and advocated for broad voter access, including for eligible voters held in county jails. Either would serve the state well at a time when election administration faces constant attacks. Danielson earns the nod because of her rural roots, record of reelection and active role in successful legislative efforts to make voting in Colorado more accessible.Support from the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, Chairman Melvin J. Baker, Council Member Andrew Gallegos, La Plata County Clerk Tiffany Lee and county clerks from both parties underscores her credibility across Colorado's political and geographic landscape. Advancing Danielson to November would be the better choice.RepublicanJames Wiley is unopposed.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-primary-choices-an-early-look/</link>
        <title>Our view: Primary choices – an early look</title>
        <description>Colorado voters approved open primaries in 2016 when Proposition 108 passed, allowing unaffiliated voters to participate in either major party’s primary. Last month, a Denver judge rejected an effort by Republican candidates, including CD3 challenger Ron Hanks, to block unaffiliated...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">5A83A0F0-0CAD-40EE-823F-FBB688F86C2D</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Colorado voters approved open primaries in 2016 when Proposition 108 passed, allowing unaffiliated voters to participate in either major party's primary. Last month, a Denver judge rejected an effort by Republican candidates, including CD3 challenger Ron Hanks, to block unaffiliated voters from voting in this year's primary – an effort opposed by incumbent Rep. Jeff Hurd.The ruling preserves access for Colorado's largest voting bloc. Of the state's nearly 4 million registered voters, 53% are unaffiliated, compared with 25% Democrats and 22% Republicans. Excluding them from the primary process would deny participation to more than half Colorado's electorate.Ballots will be mailed June 8 for Colorado's June 30 primary election.U.S. Senate – Democratic Party PrimaryJulie Gonzales was elected to the state Senate in 2018, returned in 2022, and served as majority whip. She has chaired the judiciary committee, been vice chair of local government and housing, and serves on appropriations.A Yale graduate with longtime Colorado roots, Gonzales, 43, grew up partly in Arizona on her family's ranch.She has worked to defend immigrant protections and abortion rights and to end the death penalty. She faults incumbent Sen. John Hickenlooper for insufficient advocacy on public lands and climate, and for accepting corporate campaign funding.Hickenlooper has described himself as a failed geologist who went on to cofound one of Denver's first brewpubs before serving as Denver mayor (2003–2011) and Colorado governor (2011–2019). He helped create the state's water plan, advocated for Ute Mountain Ute economic, water and broadband priorities, and worked on gun safety legislation.Hickenlooper is more inclined to work thoughtfully behind the scenes than to raise his voice from the Senate lectern.While Julie Gonzales has built a formidable record and clearly knows Coloradans' needs, advancing incumbent John Hickenlooper to November would be best for the state. Colorado hasn't heard the last of her – she has the talent and experience to one day serve in higher office.Republicans will advance state Sen. Mark Baisley of Woodland Park to November without a contested primary.Congressional District 3 – Democratic Party PrimaryAlex Kelloff is a business owner with more than three decades of experience in telecommunications and infrastructure development. He spent much of the past year traveling the district, emphasizing affordability, rural economic development, health care access and public lands. Kelloff has highlighted his family's roots in the San Luis Valley and earned endorsements from former Congressman John Salazar and current state Rep. Katie Stewart.Dwayne Romero is a West Point graduate, Army Ranger and Bronze Star recipient who served as Colorado's economic development director under then-Gov. John Hickenlooper and in several local elected roles. Romero has centered his campaign on affordability, public lands, water, health care and support for rural communities.Both candidates have focused on issues that matter to Western and Southern Colorado. Kelloff's background in infrastructure and economic development offers a thoughtful perspective on the district's challenges. Romero, however, brings a broader record of public service, military leadership and community involvement. His experience in state government, local elected office and business gives him a deeper understanding of rural Colorado and the practical realities of governing. Advancing Romero to November would give Democrats their strongest candidate in the general election. Kelloff has run a serious campaign and demonstrated a genuine commitment to the district's future.Congressional District 3 – Republican Party PrimaryRon Hanks is a former state representative, military veteran and self-described America First conservative. He has aligned himself closely with President Donald Trump and criticized Hurd for breaking with the Republican president on tariffs, public lands and a vote against censuring Rep. Ilhan Omar.Hurd, a Grand Junction attorney elected in 2024, has demonstrated a willingness to depart from party orthodoxy when he believes it is warranted. He also opposed efforts to exclude unaffiliated voters from the primary process, drawing criticism from the Republican Party's right flank.While Hurd should continue demonstrating that independence – particularly by supporting Sen. Michael Bennet's Public Lands Integrity Act and standing firm against efforts to sell public lands – advancing him to November is the better choice. Hanks' challenge is rooted in a brand of politics that seeks to narrow participation rather than broaden it, a direction Colorado voters rejected when they approved open primaries nearly a decade ago.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-75th-general-assembly/</link>
        <title>Our view: 75th General Assembly</title>
        <description>A legislative session of hard choices – and revealing priorities</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">68736909-19E5-497C-BE96-1A99932C0968</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[A legislative session of hard choices – and revealing prioritiesColorado lawmakers adjourned the 2026 session on Friday, May 13. The clearest takeaway is not simply what lawmakers passed but what they chose to prioritize in a year defined by scarcity.Legislators spent 120 days navigating a budget shortfall estimated at $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion, driven by Medicaid costs, slowing revenue growth and federal uncertainty. Democrats blamed cuts and chaos in Washington. Republicans blamed years of overspending and unchecked program growth. Both sides agreed on one thing: There was not enough money.The cuts were real. Medicaid became the state’s biggest budget pressure point after costs exceeded projections, particularly in behavioral health and long-term care. Rather than dramatically cutting eligibility, lawmakers slowed spending growth, delayed expansions, leaned on federal matching dollars and cut elsewhere in the budget to keep the program afloat.Other reductions rippled throughout state government. Agencies were asked to scale back requests. Projects were delayed. Gov. Jared Polis’ request for funding for two new prisons was rejected, with lawmakers instead authorizing the Department of Corrections to explore contracting for beds at previously closed private facilities. Of more than 600 bills introduced this session, many with significant fiscal impacts, were either killed outright or rewritten to reduce costs.Even amid those constraints, lawmakers pursued some of Colorado’s most contentious policy fights.Democrats passed bills allowing lawsuits against federal immigration authorities over alleged constitutional violations and expanding state oversight of immigration detention facilities. Another measure requires colleges and universities with student health centers to provide access to abortion medication. Lawmakers also approved changes to vaccine policy allowing Colorado to rely on guidance from medical organizations instead of federal recommendations.Colorado continued its struggle over firearms regulation. Senate Bill 25-003 creates new training and permitting requirements for purchases of certain semiautomatic firearms beginning Aug. 1. Supporters say it promotes responsible ownership and public safety. Critics argue it infringes on constitutional rights.The session also exposed tensions over Colorado’s economic future, particularly surrounding artificial intelligence and data centers. Lawmakers approved a compromise AI-regulation bill requiring disclosure when AI influences decisions involving jobs, loans or college admissions, while competing data-center bills failed in the session’s final days. One offered tax incentives to attract development. The other sought stricter water and energy protections.In the end, lawmakers reached no consensus. Colorado will continue without major subsidies for data centers – but also without meaningful statewide guardrails on their environmental impact.The debate underscores Colorado’s difficult balance between climate goals, affordability and competing in the AI economy.Another revealing discussion emerged about prison overcrowding. Senate Bill 159 modestly expands earned-time credits and creates a working group to address chronic overcrowding in state prisons. Supporters described it as pragmatic management of an unsustainable system. Critics called it soft on crime.A letter we publish today from a current inmate argues Colorado’s prison crisis reflects decades of costly expansion and poor management. The point underscores a reality lawmakers must confront: Systems built during years of expansion are becoming increasingly expensive and difficult to sustain.To lawmakers’ credit, not all major legislation fell along partisan lines. Sen. Cleave Simpson helped lead bipartisan legislation addressing Colorado’s growing backlog of mentally ill defendants deemed incompetent to stand trial, while Rep. Katie Stewart advanced bipartisan jail sexual-abuse protections following allegations involving a former La Plata County Jail commander.This session revealed difficult choices shaping Colorado’s future. Faced with painful fiscal constraints, lawmakers still found room for battles over immigration, abortion, firearms, artificial intelligence and criminal justice.Voters will decide whether those were the right priorities.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-colorado-public-lands-day/</link>
        <title>Our view: Colorado Public Lands Day</title>
        <description>The threats have never been more real – or the stakes higher</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">392D6183-1150-4700-A372-93C91C421C1C</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The threats have never been more real – or the stakes higherSince 2016, Colorado has observed the third Saturday in May as Public Lands Day, honoring the role public lands play in the state’s identity, economy and quality of life. In a state where more than 22 million acres are publicly owned, the connection is obvious. Public lands are where families hunt, fish, hike, camp, ski, ride horses, mountain bike, drive off-highway vehicles, graze cattle and find solitude. They are also where rural economies survive.But this year’s celebration arrived amid a steady barrage of threats from the Trump administration and congressional Republicans aimed at weakening protections, undermining balanced management and reviving efforts to privatize or sell public lands across the West.On May 11, the administration rescinded the Bureau of Land Management’s Public Lands Rule, which had placed conservation on equal footing with grazing, recreation and energy development. The move adds to a broader rollback of public lands and environmental protections, including last year’s repeal of the U.S. Forest Service’s Roadless Rule, which for nearly 25 years protected roughly 30% of National Forest lands from development and served as one of Colorado’s and the nation’s most important open-space safeguards.The move also adds to sustained efforts to weaken National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Water Act protections, expand mining near the Boundary Waters and Chaco Canyon, and reduce staffing across federal land management agencies. The administration plans to close U.S. Forest Service research stations and relocate agency headquarters to Salt Lake City, the home state of Utah Sen. Mike Lee, a leading proponent of transferring federal lands to state control.Now, congressional Republicans are targeting Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument through the Congressional Review Act, seeking to overturn its management plan and reopen it to energy development. On May 14, more than 150 scientists urged Congress to vote no, warning the move threatens one of the nation’s premier laboratories for paleontology, archaeology and ecological research.The threat also has a name. Trump’s nomination of former New Mexico Congressman Steve Pearce to lead the BLM – the agency that manages 245 million acres of federal public land – advanced in the Senate 46-45 on May 11. Pearce, who has spent his career backing efforts to transfer, sell or otherwise dispose of federal public lands, was confirmed Monday in a party-line vote, 46-43. Putting him in charge of the BLM raises serious concerns about the agency’s future direction.That is why one bright spot deserves attention right now.Colorado Sen. Michael Bennet’s newly introduced Public Lands Integrity Act would close the loophole that nearly allowed public lands to be sold through the federal budget reconciliation process with only a simple majority vote.Rep. Jeff Hurd and other Western Republicans who publicly opposed last year’s proposed sell-offs now have an opportunity to prove those statements were more than rhetoric. House members are reportedly developing a companion bill and seeking bipartisan support, and Hurd should sign on.The proposal should not be controversial – public lands are not a partisan possession. They are part of the shared inheritance of the American West. Ranchers rely on grazing allotments. Hunters and anglers depend on habitat protections. Rural communities depend on tourism, recreation and the quality of life that public lands provide.Outdoor recreation alone contributes $13.9 billion annually to Colorado’s GDP and supports 130,000 direct jobs. Ninety-two percent of Colorado residents participate each year. While outdoor recreation now surpasses agriculture and extractive industries in direct economic output, the real value of agriculture runs deeper.Working ranches and farms preserve open space, maintain wildlife corridors and protect the viewsheds and landscapes that define Colorado’s identity and fuel its outdoor economy. Tip that balance toward extraction and you change the landscape – and undermine the very economy those recreation numbers depend on.Colorado Public Lands Day is more than a celebration of scenery. It is a reminder that stewardship requires vigilance. Public lands remain one of the few truly shared civic ideas left in American life: places owned equally by everyone, regardless of wealth or politics.Public lands are part of Colorado’s economy, heritage and identity. They deserve more than symbolic praise one Saturday each May. They deserve protection.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-take-pride-where-you-reside/</link>
        <title>Our view: Take pride where you reside</title>
        <description>Montezuma County’s cleanup effort deserves community support</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">6129504B-6DFC-4D7D-8241-7C115048CB56</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Montezuma County’s cleanup effort deserves community supportBeauty may be in the eye of the beholder, but most people know the difference between rustic charm and a growing pile of junk.The old saying, “One man’s trash is another man’s treasure,” certainly applies in rural communities, where reuse, restoration and self-reliance are part of the culture. But there comes a point where accumulated debris, abandoned vehicles and neglected properties stop being “treasure” and start affecting neighbors, public safety and community pride.To their credit, Montezuma County commissioners appear to recognize that distinction.One of the first major issues commissioners addressed this year was public concern about blight, trash accumulation and deteriorating properties. They moved relatively quickly, encouraged public participation and worked with county staff to begin shaping a balanced response.In a recent guest column (Journal, April 29), commissioners Jim Candelaria, Kent Lindsay and Gerald Koppenhafer outlined an approach that combines voluntary cleanup efforts with possible long-term updates to county land-use and rubbish regulations.This year’s county theme, “Take Pride Where You Reside,” captures that approach. Rather than beginning with threats of enforcement, county leaders are starting with practical incentives and community participation while acknowledging that chronic problems may eventually require stronger action.Commissioners noted that neglected properties affect more than appearances. They can hurt neighboring property values, contribute to illegal dumping and create environmental and public health concerns. In Southwest Colorado, they can also increase wildfire risk.Anyone who has watched a fast-moving grass fire understands how easily dry vegetation, stacked materials and accumulated debris can become fuel. Cleaning up properties will not eliminate wildfire danger, but reducing combustible clutter can improve defensible space around homes and structures.The county’s first step comes this week with countywide cleanup days Friday and Saturday, May 15 and 16, when landfill tipping fees will be waived for Montezuma County residents at the county landfill. Household trash, tires, furniture, mattresses, electronics and appliances without freon will be accepted free of charge.Residents should expect long lines and are encouraged to sort materials before arriving to help keep traffic moving safely and efficiently. Commercial waste will not be accepted, and residents should bring proof of county residency. A full list of accepted and prohibited items is available on the county website. Residents who need assistance should contact the county directly.Other local governments are participating as well. Cortez will host cleanup week May 18 to 22. Dolores cleanup days are May 18 and 19, while Mancos cleanup days are May 15 and 16.The commissioners also deserve credit for acknowledging that voluntary compliance alone does not always work. The county’s land-use framework reportedly dates back to the 1990s and offers limited enforcement authority.Any discussion of blight enforcement in a rural county will raise legitimate concerns about private property rights and how far local government should go in regulating private land. Those debates are already surfacing publicly as county leaders consider a possible rubbish ordinance to address chronic trash concerns – a conversation likely to continue as proposals become more specific.Commissioners recently highlighted one case in which the county provided a roll-off dumpster and covered disposal costs while requiring a property owner to address trash accumulation and a noncompliant wastewater system. That combination of accountability and assistance deserves support.Not every resident struggling with cleanup is simply negligent. Some may be elderly, experiencing a disability, financially strained or overwhelmed by circumstances. A successful cleanup effort will require cooperation, flexibility and a willingness to help neighbors where possible.“Take Pride Where You Reside” may sound simple, but the underlying idea is worthwhile. Communities reflect the care people invest in them.Montezuma County commissioners deserve credit for responding to community concerns with an approach that combines incentives, public participation and, when necessary, enforcement. That combination stands a better chance of success than enforcement alone.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-drought-demands-action/</link>
        <title>Our view: Drought demands action</title>
        <description>Cortez and Durango move to restrict water use</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">D3710107-36FB-41D3-A7E7-C97442A5448C</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Cortez and Durango move to restrict water useSouthwest Colorado is in extreme drought, and municipalities are responding with restrictions. Cortez and Durango have both moved to limit outdoor water use – a signal conservation is no longer optional.Cortez is on a phased path, with voluntary restrictions beginning April 1 and mandatory limits starting May 15 through Sept. 15, including daytime watering bans. The city is coordinating outreach and education with Dolores, Mancos, the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and Montezuma County.McPhee Reservoir, Cortez’s primary source, is expected to rise only five to six feet this summer. Ken Curtis of the Dolores Water Conservancy District called it “pathetically low.” Junior water rights holders may receive just 15% of normal allocations, with shortages possible by midsummer (Journal, April 15).The Dolores Water Conservancy District split limited irrigation water between Ute Mountain Ute Farm and Ranch Enterprises and northern irrigators – about 385 acre-feet each. As one board member put it: “It’s gonna be ugly.”Conditions on the Animas remain manageable, but the Dolores River is a different story. In low-snow years, flows below McPhee can nearly disappear, isolating pools, stressing native fish and limiting recreation. According to Rica Fulton of Dolores River Boating Advocates, commercial boating has been possible only three times in the past decade (Journal, April 1).The crisis extends beyond Southwest Colorado. At a recent water seminar in Ignacio, officials and stakeholders underscored how quickly conditions are worsening across the region. Southwest Colorado has faced nearly 25 years of low snowpack, with higher temperatures compounding the problem – more precipitation falling as rain and snowmelt arriving earlier, reducing late-season supply (Journal, April 8). Colorado River Commissioner Becky Mitchell delivered a stark assessment of negotiations among the seven states that rely on the river: deadlines have passed, agreements have lapsed, and Lake Powell and Lake Mead sit at critically low levels. She praised the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe for using only a small fraction of its allocated water and warned that further cuts would deepen an already painful year (Journal, April 1).Durango enacted Stage 1 mandatory restrictions April 11, limiting lawn irrigation to three days a week and targeting a 20% reduction in demand. Violators face fines up to $300 and possible disconnection (Journal, April 15).Residents should act now: water only during allowed hours, fix leaks, reduce overspray and consider replacing turf with low-water landscaping.Current restrictions are a floor, not a ceiling. Avoiding stricter measures depends on whether residents and businesses act now.For agricultural producers, Colorado State University Extension is hosting a drought planning workshop Thursday, April 23, 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at the Lewis-Arriola Community Center in Cortez. Registration is $5 and includes dinner; sign up at https://col.st/onfdw or call 970-570-5497.The Nature Conservancy is offering grants of $25,000 to $100,000 for flood and drought resilience projects in Southwest Colorado. Applications are due by 5 p.m. May 22; contact swcofunding@tnc.org (Journal, April 22).Water in Southwest Colorado is not a resource to be managed in wet years. It is one to be protected in all of them.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-your-vote-your-city/</link>
        <title>Our view: Your vote, your city</title>
        <description>What to know before April 7</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">60CEDC6A-67FA-4DB9-A1AF-D959D8B63323</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[What to know before April 7City council work demands specific skills – understanding municipal budgets, infrastructure planning, land use, water rights and the legal frameworks that govern how cities operate. Good intentions matter, but preparation matters more. Ask every candidate: Have you read the city budget? Have you attended council meetings? Have you talked to city staff? And perhaps most importantly – can you work collaboratively with people who see things differently?Voters are electing three four-year seats and two two-year seats. The top three vote-getters earn four-year terms; fourth and fifth place also earns a two-year term.Candidates appear in ballot order. Travis Shepherd, 51, service writer, management background. Kathleen Swope, 69, retired teacher, 40-plus years working with diverse stakeholders. Charles Borchini Jr., 46, process server, small business owner, Planning and Zoning Commission member. Michael Bischoff, also known as Gandolf, provided limited background information. Carly Wolf, 32, owns Doobie Sisters, serves on nonprofit boards, Leadership Montezuma graduate, second council run. Clarisa Osborn, 38, manages the 22nd Judicial District DA's Office, overseeing large budgets and grants. Randy Vialpando was unable to attend the League of Women Voters forum due to illness and did not respond to The Journal's questionnaire (Journal, March 11). James McGinley, 74, MBA from Syracuse, 27 years leading complex organizations. Bruce Burkett, 36, senior pastor, Lighthouse Baptist Church. Dennis Spruell, 68, the only incumbent – 30-year Cortez police veteran, former county sheriff, current mayor pro tem. Claire West, 32, business consultant managing regional government funding.***On the ballot: Four charter amendmentsThe Cortez City Charter is the city's local constitution, first established in 1957. Four amendments are on your ballot.Question 1 modernizes the charter with grammar corrections, updates city manager qualifications, and replaces gendered pronouns – nearly 70 years overdue. One provision removes the requirement that the city manager live within city limits. We understand housing challenges, but a city manager should be deeply invested in the community they serve. The Journal’s editorial board strongly encourage council to negotiate at minimum Montezuma County residency in any future contract. We recommend yes, with that reservation noted.Question 2 would allow council to set its own compensation through ordinance rather than voter approval. Pay hasn't changed since 2011 and the job warrants more. But voters should make that call. We recommend no.Question 3 allows emergency meeting locations and remote attendance, capped at six meetings per year. Contingency planning is wise – COVID and wildfires taught us that. But in-person connection between residents and their representatives is a defining aspect of rural communities. Remote attendance must remain a genuine last resort, cameras on. We recommend yes, cautiously.Question 4 clarifies term limit language to align with home rule authority. Our concern: an appointed councilor completing a predecessor's term could be prevented from serving a full second term voters chose them for. Limiting a councilor to less than two full terms raises questions about whether this language can withstand legal scrutiny. We recommend no.Ballots must be received by 7 p.m. on Tuesday, April 7 – postmarks do not count. Vote for no more than five; voting for more disqualifies your ballot. For election information visit cortezco.gov/248/Elections or contact the Cortez City Clerk at 970-564-4008 or dwells@cortezco.gov. The Journal’s editorial board thanks departing council members Matthew Keefauver, Lydia DeHaven, Robert Dobry, and Mayor Rachel Medina. To every candidate: thank you. Win or lose, stay engaged – Cortez needs you.Editor’s note: An earlier version of this editorial omitted that the fifth-place vote-getter also earns a two-year term, and incorrectly listed the Montezuma County clerk and contact information instead of the Cortez city clerk.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-in-georges-shadow/</link>
        <title>Our view: In George’s shadow</title>
        <description>Selections from the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776, which listed the inimical actions of the King of Great Britain. Today, replicated by another king: Tattered American Flagcca – He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">750C3656-B403-4597-BA11-4587DB7481AB</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=77DD8C29-F4D3-5BE4-B89C-25300C784A77&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.0009901&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.59405941" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=77DD8C29-F4D3-5BE4-B89C-25300C784A77&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=0.0009901&#038;crop_w=0.99999&#038;crop_h=0.59405941" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Selections from the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776, which listed the inimical actions of the King of Great Britain. Today, replicated by another king:Tattered American Flagcca– He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.– He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations …– He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.– He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices …– He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.– He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world.For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury.For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences.– He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us …]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-hail-the-parliamentarian/</link>
        <title>Our view: Hail the Parliamentarian</title>
        <description>Hurd is helping but Elizabeth MacDonough is our hero In January, Rep. Jeff Hurd said that he is “cautiously optimistic that there’s a lot of good that we can do in this next Congress with the help of President Donald...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">F0ECA311-AC24-4731-9EBC-07B396807152</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hurd is helping but Elizabeth MacDonough is our heroIn January, Rep. Jeff Hurd said that he is “cautiously optimistic that there’s a lot of good that we can do in this next Congress with the help of President Donald Trump and our Republican Senate.” (Journal, Jun. 18). We wonder what he thinks now that Republicans have worked hard to do so many things that hurt rather than help the 3rd Congressional District.Tuesday, we got word that over the weekend and through Monday, Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough issued several key rulings that determined what can stay and what must be removed from the budget reconciliation bill.The Journal’s editorial board is exhaling and relieved to learn MacDonough’s actions – doing her job as a nonpartisan and unbiased adviser to the Senate interpreting and applying its rules and precedents – have for now resulted in some of the most harmful proposals of the bill being removed. Things like cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, kneecapping the judiciary and the sale of millions of acres of public lands our communities rely on are gone.Reps. Hurd and Neguse (CO2) issued a strongly worded bipartisan statement of support on Tuesday about the removal of the sale of millions of acres of public lands from the bill.“Colorado’s public lands belong to the people and are held in trust for future generations. They don’t belong to political appointees or outside interests. Neither of our districts asked for this land sale, and any efforts to sell off these shared spaces are deeply unpopular with the hunters, ranchers, fishermen, recreationists, conservationists, and outdoor enthusiasts we are proud to represent in Congress. Republican or Democrat – representing red, purple, or blue districts – sentiment continues to ring true: public lands are not for sale,” they said.We can hear the indignation in their words that such a proposal represents and the Liberty Bell ringing in the background. Nothing is more uniquely American for Westerners than the public lands we collectively own and steward.Hurd supported the megabill that came out of the House with deep cuts to Medicaid and SNAP pushing the cost to cash-strapped states like our own. Thanks to MacDonough SNAP cuts are gone and Republicans are left to figure out a $128 billion dollar hole that line item represented in ‘savings.’ For whom we’re not sure, since 316,572 CD3 residents (14% of households) receive SNAP benefits according to the USDA Food and Nutrition Service.Although Hurd signed onto letters urging Republican leadership to preserve Medicaid and clean energy tax credits, it remains to be seen what will emerge. With one quarter of Southwest Colorado residents relying on Medicaid, The Journal’s editorial board agrees with Hurd and his colleagues, “Balancing the federal budget must not come at the expense of those who depend on these benefits for their health and economic security … We will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations,” the Representatives wrote.The bill provision that disallowed states from regulating Artificial Intelligence was retained but only applies to states wishing to access federal Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program funds. This program has benefited Southwest Colorado local governments seeking to expand high-speed internet access for underserved communities. Unfortunately, recent changes to it resulted in the improvements being halted (Journal, Jun. 13).We encourage Rep. Hurd to work to restore integrity to this program, keep public lands in public hands and retain Medicaid support for the district as the Senate finalizes the bill, and when it comes back to the House.We’re especially grateful to Parliamentarian MacDonough for doing her job that has inserted some sanity into this budget process. May she have the wind at her back.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-epa/</link>
        <title>Our view: EPA</title>
        <description>Protecting public health and the environment, but will it last? Last week, the City of Cortez was one of seven recipients to learn that on May 16, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency awarded the city a $500,000 Brownfields Grant to...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">DAB3EF9C-2B3A-4AA6-B69B-747529F0C728</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Protecting public health and the environment, but will it last?Last week, the City of Cortez was one of seven recipients to learn that on May 16, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency awarded the city a $500,000 Brownfields Grant to clean up three unused buildings at the Cortez Municipal Airport contaminated with asbestos, lead-based paint and petroleum.Think brown vs. green fields and you get the picture of why the EPA in 1995 established this aptly named program to return brownfields to productive use in both urban and rural communities. The premise is that brownfields funding can help communities clean up impacted sites, reduce environmental and health risks, and bolster economic development and community revitalization efforts. In some areas, former landfills have been redeveloped into community parks, new housing and businesses have been launched.Kudos to the City of Cortez for seeking and securing this funding. Whether or not future EPA grant funding opportunities will continue to exist is unclear. Since the Trump administration came into office, DOGE has been chainsawing its way through the federal government and much of what we’ve come to expect (and taken for granted) has been thrown into question.Under Trump, the EPA, founded in 1970 by President Richard Nixon with a charge to protect the environment and human health, is facing up to 55% cuts to its budget. As Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said last week, in a heated exchange with EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, “In your view and President Donald Trump’s view, more than half the efforts to make sure Americans have clean air and clean water is just a waste.”Environmental protection has not always been partisan. The 1970 Clean Air Act and 1972 Clean Water Act were also signed into law by Nixon. The Journal’s editorial board wishes our politicians could and would return to those days, as what is good for the environment and human health is also good for communities and economies.We’re fortunate that Rep. Jeff Hurd (R-CO), as it applies to adversely affected small businesses and communities, recognizes this fact. In February, with Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper, Hurd introduced the Gold King Mine Spill Compensation Act to make whole Four Corners communities affected by the 2015 Gold King Mine spill. There is every reason this bill should continue to advance and be approved for funding by Congress. If approved, this funding would come through the EPA.The editorial board is concerned about the future of the agency, however, as it learns it is poised to cancel another 400 grants to the already 377 that have been canceled. Grants to communities, like Cortez, for things like detecting and preventing lead poisoning in children, flood mitigation, and disaster resilience projects are all at risk. As is our nation's public and environmental health.There is no way the agency can continue to function with a 55% reduction in budget, a return to funding at 1980s levels, and continue to provide the same protections it has for the past fifty years. We urge Rep. Hurd to fulfill his duty to protect constituents and communities and support the future of the E.P.A.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-american-sell-out/</link>
        <title>Our view: American sell out</title>
        <description>There is little ‘big and beautiful’ about the Republicans’ budget, especially for public lands The president’s “big, beautiful” tax, defense, energy and immigration bill crashed and burned on Friday and with it temporarily the un-American idea that we should pay...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 05:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">2E0AB321-59D3-4AD0-8E4C-CC024A2CA681</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[There is little ‘big and beautiful’ about the Republicans’ budget, especially for public landsThe president’s “big, beautiful” tax, defense, energy and immigration bill crashed and burned on Friday and with it temporarily the un-American idea that we should pay for tax breaks for a majority of wealthy Americans by selling the public lands owned by the rest of us 346 million Americans.Unique to this country, public lands are every American’s birthright, national treasure and greatest wealth. Selling our shared public estate is an idea the Journal’s editorial board fiercely opposes, as should all Americans and members of Congress.But that’s not what is happening. Earlier this year, we warned readers about the Republican’s draft budget (Journal, Feb. 5), which is finally coming to pass. Today, it is with the greatest urgency, perhaps in the history of our nation, that we ask Rep. Jeff Hurd to reconsider his support of the House Natural Resources Committee’s budget reconciliation bill that after a middle-of-the-night amendment last week now includes a provision to sell approximately 500,000 acres of public land in Utah and Nevada. A land area the size of our backyard Weminuche Wilderness, Colorado’s largest, this action would set a terrible precedent for the remainder of the almost 300 million acres of public lands nationwide and essentially open the door to their sale, never to be returned to the public trust.Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada and Celeste Maloy of Utah, who introduced the amendment, stated the purpose is to use the parcels for economic development, for things like mining and infrastructure, expanding an airport and reservoir, and for affordable housing. As with other public land leases, these activities similarly could be accomplished by expanding the type of activity permitted on public lands, not by selling them for a one-time cash infusion to the U.S. treasury and transferring a public asset into private hands.As we seek Hurd’s support, we must thank him first for hearing his Western Slope constituents’ opposition to this idea and being the sole Republican on the HNRC to vote against the amendment. Also, in time for Colorado Public Lands Day on Saturday, Hurd deserves credit for demonstrating his support for public lands last week by introducing, with Democratic Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper, the Gunnison Outdoor Resources Protection Act. Oddly, Hurd did not support the senators’ companion bill, the Dolores River National Conservation Act, a bipartisan bill also introduced last week supported in the last Congress by Republican Reps. Lamborn, Boebert and Buck.We are seeking consistency from our representatives and would like to see him support this bill, too. Similarly, although Hurd voted against the amendment, which passed, he voted for the final HRNC bill that contains the Nevada and Utah public lands sale.With haste, we urge Hurd to ask House Republican leadership to strip the public lands sale provision from the House final budget package. If it advances to the Senate, we will be looking for Sens. Bennet and Hickenlooper to do the same.But that’s not the only thing that should be removed. Democrats and environmentalists are calling this bill one of the most extreme, anti-environmental bills in U.S. history. If one remembers James Watt, U.S. secretary of the Interior from 1981-83, it’s his policies on steroids.Watt’s policies, as do provisions of the HNRC bill, opened up federal lands and prioritized access to them by oil and gas, mining and timber companies. The bill introduces pay-to-play provisions for these companies to buy a speedier environmental review process (achieved by neutering the National Environmental Policy Act) that excludes the public from having input over balancing uses between conservation and development.The Journal’s editorial board calls on Hurd to stand up for his constituents, for public input and for keeping public lands in public hands. We urge Hurd to push back on his party and join Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT) in voicing his opposition to the sale of public lands, “It’s a ‘no’ now. It will be a ‘no’ later. It will be a ‘no’ forever.”]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-celebrating-and-defending-public-media/</link>
        <title>Our view: Celebrating and defending public media</title>
        <description>The Journal’s editorial board would like to call readers’ attention to tomorrow’s “Protect My Public Media Day,” (visit protectmypublicmedia.org), a day our public media colleagues are working to put the value of public media squarely before those who, we hope,...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">914023C9-BF8C-40D7-A787-C07A074BE00A</guid>
        <media:content url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=1152F1B9-9F4E-5998-9D5E-66E0B79F33CD&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.75375&#038;crop_h=0.99999" medium="image" type="image/jpeg" />
        <media:thumbnail url="https://imengine.public.prod.dur.navigacloud.com/?uuid=1152F1B9-9F4E-5998-9D5E-66E0B79F33CD&#038;function=cropresize&#038;type=preview&#038;source=false&#038;q=75&#038;width=1200&#038;x=1.0E-5&#038;y=1.0E-5&#038;crop_w=0.75375&#038;crop_h=0.99999" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Journal’s editorial board would like to call readers’ attention to tomorrow’s “Protect My Public Media Day,” (visit protectmypublicmedia.org), a day our public media colleagues are working to put the value of public media squarely before those who, we hope, have the ability to protect it, including you.Protect My Public Media ccaAs March 14 approaches, and the current continuing resolution funding the federal government expires, Congress will be making decisions that may well affect the future of public media, specifically about the Corporation for Public Broadcasting that funds a percentage of it, nationally, $1.60 per person annually.Public and private, we are all a part of a shrinking news media ecosystem none of us wants to see diminished further. Nor do our audiences, especially in rural areas. Since 2005, we’ve lost one-third of the nation’s newspapers. We certainly don’t want to see any erosion of public radio and television stations serving our area.Our rural region cannot sustain it.Public radio and television across numerous platforms provides taxpayer-funded, trusted local news and information, music, cultural and public affairs programs, and important public safety alerts.For decades there has been bipartisan support of CPB. Potential cuts, which are more real than ever, will affect us locally – and negatively.For 49 years, KSUT, Four Corners Public Radio and Tribal Radio, has operated across 130,000 square miles transmitting across Montezuma, La Plata, San Juan, and Archuleta counties and in San Juan County, New Mexico. It serves the Southern Ute, Ute Mountain Ute, and Jicarilla Apache Nations, and the northeast portion of the Navajo Nation all the way to Monument Valley where little to no internet connectivity exists.Many of us stream “terrestrial radio stations,” but many without internet access listen in their cars or on home and/or portable radios. This service can be lifesaving during natural disasters and when the electricity is out.On Feb. 19, KSUT received a Notice of Stop Work for a $537,000 Next Generation Warning System grant. KSJD received the same stop work order for a $55,000 award.The ink was still wet on the agreement KSUT signed just the week before that would provide back up power and redundancies at all nine of its transmission sites. In the case of a fire, remote login would be possible instead of a time-intensive snowmobile ride up to Missionary Ridge to flip one switch such that the station, and listeners, experienced for three days during the Valentine’s Day blizzard. A car hit an electric pole taking out power and its 90.1 broadcast, affecting Silverton and Durango. Not an opportune time or locations for radio signals to be down.The NGWS grant would also help KSJD, in operation for 37 years, upgrade its three aging radio transmitters and improve back up power in the event of emergencies when communication is critical.Both stations also receive CPB Community Service Grants for general operations – KSJD 30% of its budget, approximately $167,000 a year – which support programming costs and salaries for its programming director and news reporter. KSUT receives approximately 20% of its operating budget from CPB, approximately $333,000 this year.The reduction or elimination of these funds will likely require cuts not only to staff and programming, but be hard to make up as they will hit the program producers, too, and make everything more expensive.CPB cuts will erode our rural quality of life and the cultural and informational fabric we weave and share via the airwaves, in KSUT’s words, “creating community on the air.”Keeping public media alive locally and via its funding from the federal government is vital. It's not a blue or red issue. It’s an issue of isolated rural communities' resilience.Our public media landscape contributes to this significantly. Take the pledge to protect public media, contact our legislators, and support KSUT during its spring fund drive, March 24-28, and KSJD, April 11-18.Private contributions are important but will not take the place of federal funding.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/our-view-honoring-native-american-military-service-sacrifice-and-patriotism/</link>
        <title>Our view: Honoring Native American military service, sacrifice and patriotism</title>
        <description>Colorado Rep. Larry Don Suckla (R-Cortez), our newest House District 58 representative to the Colorado General Assembly, has gotten off to an impactful start. He recently cosponsored House Joint Resolution 25-1019 “Honoring and recognizing the military service and contributions of...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 05:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">C428DBEE-01DC-4B86-8EAB-DBC1D399D4D6</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Colorado Rep. Larry Don Suckla (R-Cortez), our newest House District 58 representative to the Colorado General Assembly, has gotten off to an impactful start.He recently cosponsored House Joint Resolution 25-1019 “Honoring and recognizing the military service and contributions of Native American veterans and communities.” (Journal, Feb. 14).Suckla’s sprawling district includes Delta, Dolores, Gunnison, Hinsdale, Montrose, Ouray, San Miguel and parts of Montezuma County, home to the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe.Both Ute Mountain Ute Chairman Manuel Heart and Southern Ute Indian Tribe Chairman Melvin Baker visited the Capitol for the vote on the resolution. Suckla was asked to walk them down the center aisle.A prime sponsor of the resolution, Suckla joined with House Majority Leader Monica Duran (D-Wheatride) and Sens. Cleave Simpson (R-Alamosa) and Matt Ball (D-Denver) in the Senate. Of 100 legislators in the Assembly, 94 supported the resolution, including House District 59 Rep. Katie Stewart (D-Durango).In his comments, Suckla did something not many Republicans (at least in Congress) are doing – recognizing and acknowledging Native Americans as the first peoples, the people who inhabited land before the Europeans arrived, and their important contributions to our country.“It’s a humbling experience to honor people who were here first,” he said. “I grew up with the Ute tribe. I went to school with them, and since I was born, we’ve been lifelong friends.”The resolution (read it at https://bit.ly/3QyhS4M) eloquently chronicles the “contributions, sacrifices, and disproportionate service of Native American veterans” as integral to the historical success of the U.S. military.Those contributions include having served with distinction for over 200 years in every major conflict dating back to the Revolutionary War.Over 12,000 Native Americans – men and women – served in World Wars and many did so voluntarily. As did some yet without U.S. citizenship.Over 42,000 Native Americans served in Vietnam, and 10,000 in the Korean War, with hundreds of lives lost in each conflict and many injured. Today, 31,000 Native Americans and Alaska Natives are on active duty serving around the world.Approximately 60 Southern Ute veterans served in the U.S. military, including the Baker and Box families, who sacrificed their lives in service to our country. The resolution recognizes both the Ute Mountain Ute and Southern Ute Tribes as serving important leadership roles in the United Veterans Coalition of Colorado.Readers will recall that over 400 Native Americans served as Code Talkers in World War II, and used their knowledge of Navajo and other Native American languages to transmit messages. These Native languages are the same the U.S. government had worked to suppress and eradicate since the late 1800s.In a grim repeat of history, the current administration is at it again with its aggressive immigration agenda, in the mix of targeting undocumented immigrants, is looking at tribal members as noncitizens (Journal, Jan. 28).Chairman Heart, in a special announcement on Jan. 27 (Journal, Jan. 28), encouraging tribal members to know their rights including to carry two forms of identification, said, “We as the Ute people have been here thousands of years. We are currently the oldest living resident in the state of Colorado, we have predated any government that has come to this country ... (Yet, Trump’s executive orders) are now questioning our citizenship as Native Americans in the United States.”The Journal’s editorial board would like to thank Rep. Suckla, Rep. Duran, Sens. Simpson and Ball, and all supporting members of the Colorado General Assembly, for this important resolution acknowledging the first peoples of our nation and recognizing their contributions to our military.Colorado’s tribal heritage is critically important to our country’s history, and its future.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    <item>
        <link>https://tj.durangoherald.com/primaries-our-picks/</link>
        <title>Primaries: Our Picks</title>
        <description>Congressional District 3 Democratic primary ballot CD-3 is the only contested race on the Democratic primary ballot. That individual would challenge incumbent U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert or state Sen. Don Coram in November. Our Pick: Adam Frisch for his business...</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 04:45:00 -0600</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">48FF53F8-BE20-4989-AF2E-5C2D9BEF533B</guid>
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Congressional District 3Democratic primary ballot CD-3 is the only contested race on the Democratic primary ballot. That individual would challenge incumbent U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert or state Sen. Don Coram in November.Our Pick: Adam Frisch for his business experience and civic participation. His breadth of accomplishments give a sense of maturity.Republican primary ballotOur Pick: Vote for Don Coram to challenge the primary winning Democratic candidate. U.S. SenateThe winner will challenge Democratic incumbent U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet.Our Pick: Joe O’Dea is an easy choice.Governor The winner will have a tough time beating Democrat Gov. Jared Polis with his proven practical record.Our Pick: Heidi Ganahl for her innovative spirit.Secretary of StateThe winner will face Democratic incumbent Jena Griswold.Our Pick: Pam Anderson ought to be the Republican choice. Montezuma County District 1 CommissionerOnly Republicans are running for commissioner.Our Pick: Give Jim Candelaria that third term. Candelaria’s active leadership in meeting residents’ needs and moving the county forward are clear.]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
